
| TITLE: | Japanese comments on TMDM |
| SOURCE: | Mr. Motomu Naito |
| PROJECT: | FCD 13250-2: Information Technology - Topic Maps - Data Model |
| PROJECT EDITOR: | Mr. Lars Marius Garshol; Mr. Graham Moore |
| STATUS: | Comments |
| ACTION: | For information |
| DATE: | 2005-11-15 |
| DISTRIBUTION: | SC34 and Liaisons |
| REPLY TO: |
Dr. James David Mason (ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 Secretariat - Standards Council of Canada) Crane Softwrights Ltd. Box 266, Kars, ON K0A-2E0 CANADA Telephone: +1 613 489-0999 Facsimile: +1 613 489-0995 Network: jtc1sc34@scc.ca http://www.jtc1sc34.org |
2005.11.09
Japan comments
Motomu Naito
<!-- *********************************************************** -->
<!-- Comment on ISO/IEC 13250 Topic Maps - Part2: Data Model -->
<!-- *********************************************************** -->
<< General comments >>
<< technical comments >>
1. Clause 4.3 The fundamental types, 1st paragraph
"The values of information item properties may be either other
information items, ... "
should be
"The values of information item properties may be either the
item identifiers of other information items, ... ".
After this, in the sentence of property representation,
"information items"
should be
"item identifiers of information items".
For example, Clause 5.2, [topics] property,
"A set of topic items."
should be
"A set of the item identifiers of topic items."
2. Clause 4.3 The fundamental types, Set, 1st paragraph, 2nd sentence
" ... information items or strings."
should be
" ... the item identifiers of information items or strings.".
3. Clause 5.3.4 Reification, 2nd paragraph, last sentence
What is "structured from"?
4. Clause 5.4 Topic name items, [type] property
Why the Topic name items have [type] property, instead of the
Topic items?
5. Clause 5.5 Variant items, [value] property
How contents of the parameters elements and other variant element
is included in a string of [value] property? In other words, how
to handle the parameters elements and other variant elements in
XML topic maps?
6. Clause 6.2 Merging topic items
Why do C's [parent], [reified] and [roles played] properties need
not set from A's or/and B's?
<< Editorial comments >>
1. Clause 5.3.2 Identifying subjects, NOTE
"This part of ISO/IEC13250 does not require implementations to
derference ... "
should be
"This part of ISO/IEC13250 does not require implementations to
dereference ... ".
2. Clause Bibliography
The Version of UML should be 2.0.