Title: |
Summary of Voting on 2002 Systematic Review of ISO/IEC 9069:1988 – Information Processing – SGML support facilities – SGML Document Interchange Format (SDIF) |
Source: |
Mrs. Sara Desautels, JTC1/SC34 Secretariat |
Project: |
|
Project editor: |
|
Status: |
Based on the summary of National Body votes received, this standard is CONFIRMED. |
Action: |
|
Date: |
23 September 2002 |
Distribution: |
SC34 and Liaisons |
Reply to: |
Dr. James David Mason New York, NY 10036 |
RESULTS OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEW FOR ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 STANDARDS
1) ISO/IEC 9069:1988 - Information technology – SGML support facilities – SGML Document Interchange Format (SDIF)
Based on the results listed below ISO/IEC 9069:1988 will be CONFIRMED.
P-Member National Body |
Question 1 |
Question 2 |
Question 3 |
Question 4 |
Question 5 |
Comments |
Brazil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada |
|
|
|
|
|
|
China |
Confirm |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
|
Denmark |
|
|
|
|
|
|
France |
Abstain |
|
|
|
|
|
Ireland |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Italy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japan |
Confirm |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
JIS X 4174:1996 |
|
Korea, Rep. Of |
Confirm |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
KS X6010 |
|
Netherlands |
Confirm |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
NEN-ISO 9069 |
|
Norway |
Confirm |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
NS-ISO 9069 |
|
United Kingdom |
Confirm |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
BS 7138:1989 |
|
USA |
Confirm |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
ANSI 9069:1988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O-Member National Body |
Question 1 |
Question 2 |
Question 3 |
Question 4 |
Question 5 |
Comments |
Australia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Czech Republic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany |
Confirm |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
|
|
Questions to be answered in the periodical review of International Standards
P-members of JTC 1 have an obligation to vote (see 3.1.1 of the JTC 1 Directives.)
Please reply to each of the following questions, for each ISO/IEC standard (taking into account any related amendments, addenda and corrigenda).
· Question 1
(Responses are either: Confirm, Revise, or Withdraw):
Are you in favor of
- confirmation of the International Standard for a further period of five
years?
- revision of the International Standard? If YES, please give reasons.
- Withdrawal of the International Standard? If YEW, please give reasons.
· Question 2
(Responses are either: Yes or No):
If the voting results show a need to revise the standard, are you prepared to
participate in the development of the project?
- Yes
- No
· Question 3
(Responses are either: Yes or No):
Has this ISO/IEC standard been implemented as a national standard or is it used
per se by your national industry?
- Yes
- No
· Question 4 (List
the designation of the corresponding National standard):
If the response to question 3 is affirmative, is the standard implemented or
used without change?
- Yes
- No
In case of modifications, please identify the changes on a separate sheet.
· Question 5
(optional) (Enter any National Body comments in this box or attach them at the
end of the document):
Please indicate the number of the corresponding national standards: