This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of WP status.
Section: 22.5.8 [optional.comp.with.t] Status: WP Submitter: Ville Voutilainen Opened: 2022-07-25 Last modified: 2022-11-17
Priority: Not Prioritized
View all other issues in [optional.comp.with.t].
View all issues with WP status.
Discussion:
What ends up happening is that the constraints of operator<=>(const optional<T>&, const U&) end up in three_way_comparable_with, and then in partially-ordered-with, and the expressions there end up performing a conversion from U to an optional, and we end up instantiating the same operator<=> again, evaluating its constraints again, until the compiler bails out.
See an online example here. All implementations end up with infinite meta-recursion. The solution to the problem is to stop the meta-recursion by constraining the spaceship with U so that U is not publicly and unambiguously derived from a specialization of optional, SFINAEing that candidate out, and letting 22.5.6 [optional.relops]/20 perform the comparison instead.[2022-08-23; Reflector poll]
Set status to Tentatively Ready after five votes in favour during reflector poll.
[2022-11-12 Approved at November 2022 meeting in Kona. Status changed: Voting → WP.]
Proposed resolution:
This wording is relative to N4910.
[Drafting note: This proposed wording removes the only use of is-optional. ]
Modify 22.5.2 [optional.syn], header <optional> synopsis, as indicated:
[…]
namespace std {
// 22.5.3 [optional.optional], class template optional
template<class T>
class optional;
template<class T>
constexpr bool is-optional = false; // exposition only
template<class T>
constexpr bool is-optional<optional<T>> = true; // exposition only
template<class T>
concept is-derived-from-optional = requires(const T& t) { // exposition only
[]<class U>(const optional<U>&){ }(t);
};
[…]
// 22.5.8 [optional.comp.with.t], comparison with T
[…]
template<class T, class U> constexpr bool operator>=(const T&, const optional<U>&);
template<class T, class U> requires (!is-derived-from-optional<U>) && three_way_comparable_with<T, U>
constexpr compare_three_way_result_t<T, U>
operator<=>(const optional<T>&, const U&);
[…]
}
Modify 22.5.8 [optional.comp.with.t] as indicated:
template<class T, class U> requires (!is-derived-from-optional<U>) && three_way_comparable_with<T, U> constexpr compare_three_way_result_t<T, U> operator<=>(const optional<T>&, const U&);-25- Effects: Equivalent to: return x.has_value() ? *x <=> v : strong_ordering::less;