TITLE: |
Summary of Voting on SC 34 N 236 - Draft Technical
Corrigendum Ballot on ISO/IEC 15445:2000 – HyperText Markup Language
(HTML) |
SOURCE: |
SC 34
Secretariat |
PROJECT: |
|
PROJECT EDITOR: |
David Abrahamson and Roger Price |
STATUS: |
|
ACTION: |
Based on the results of this ballot, this Technical Corrigendum is APPROVED, and will be forwarded to the Project Editor for proper formatting for submission to ITTF for publication. |
DATE: |
|
DISTRIBUTION: |
SC34 and Liaisons |
REFER TO: |
|
REPLY TO: |
Dr. James David Mason
|
SC 34 N
288
2002-01-17
SC 34 Voting Summary on JTC 1/SC 34 N 236
Draft Technical Corrigendum Ballot on ISO/IEC 15445:2000 – HyperText Markup Language (HTML)
P-Member |
APPROVAL OF THE
DRAFT AS PRESENTED |
APPROVAL OF THE
DRAFT WITH COMMENTS AS GIVEN ON THE ATTACHED |
DISAPPROVAL OF
THE DRAFT FOR REASONS ON THE ATTACHED |
Acceptance of
these reasons and appropriate changes in the text will change our vote to
approval |
ABSTENTION (For Reasons
Below): |
Brazil |
|
|
|
|
|
Canada |
X |
|
|
|
|
China |
|
|
|
|
|
Denmark |
X |
|
|
|
|
France |
|
|
|
|
|
Ireland |
|
|
|
|
|
Italy |
|
|
|
|
|
Japan |
|
X |
|
|
|
Republic of Korea |
|
|
|
|
|
Netherlands |
X |
|
|
|
|
Norway |
X |
|
|
|
|
United
Kingdom |
X |
|
|
|
|
United
States |
X |
|
|
|
|
According to the JTC 1 Directives, Section 14.4.9.4.5
If the general results of the SC ballot were positive, but some comments were received, the SC Secretariat shall also forward the comments of the Project Editor for review when the voting results are distributed to the SC in accordance with 14.4.9.4.3 above. The Project Editor shall prepare responses to the comments and return them to the SC Secretariat together with a revised text of the draft technical corrigendum if any modification has resulted from the editor’s review. The SC Secretariat shall distribute the revised text and disposition of comments report to the SC for information, and shall proceed with the submittal to ITTF in accordance with 14.4.9.4.4 above (for publication). Each technical corrigendum shall list the status of all amendments and technical corrigenda to the current edition of the standard.
There is some confusion in describing element, for example
in
"3 Simultaneous ID and NAME attributes"
... provided for the
<A> [W3C 12.2] and <MAP> [W3C 13.6.1] elements.
in
"6 FORM content model"
The BUTTON element
should ... of a FORM element.
They should be described in an identical style, e.g., <XXX> element.