[SG10] __cpp_variadic_using for p0195r2?
John Spicer
jhs at edg.com
Mon Dec 19 23:48:26 CET 2016
> On Dec 19, 2016, at 5:27 PM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2016/p0195r2.html <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2016/p0195r2.html> suggests a feature test macro of __cpp_variadic_using; the value would presumably be 201611. Does that seem OK to everyone?
>
I think it is okay.
I think it is slightly odd as the change is to allow multiple names in a using-declaration, but the expected use case is for variadics.
I’d also be okay with something like __cpp_multi_using.
__cpp_variadic_using had more support when it was discussed in core, FWIW.
John.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.open-std.org/pipermail/features/attachments/20161219/494aff2b/attachment.html
More information about the Features
mailing list