[ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers?
Nevin Liber
nevin at eviloverlord.com
Mon Aug 26 20:58:51 CEST 2013
On 26 August 2013 13:52, Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen at gmail.com>wrote:
>
> I have strong reasons to believe we'll see an NB comment proposing
> std::less
> to be specialized for tuple<T*> and containers.
>
What about tuple<T*&>? I'm thinking about what is returned from std::tie,
as one quick way to implement a comparison operator for a user defined type
is to compare the result of std::tie called on the appropriate member
variables.
--
Nevin ":-)" Liber <mailto:nevin at eviloverlord.com> (847) 691-1404
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.open-std.org/pipermail/ub/attachments/20130826/89bc15a5/attachment.html
More information about the ub
mailing list