[Tooling] Dependency format with module details implementation

Ben Boeckel ben.boeckel at kitware.com
Wed Apr 3 22:57:05 CEST 2019


On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 19:15:20 -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote:
>   - Bikeshedding. Feel free to suggest names for fields or the format
>     itself, but please refrain from commenting on name suggestions
>     themselves (in support for or against). I'll collect up all
>     suggestions and we can discuss them in the future once we have the
>     semantics nailed down.

Having seen no naming suggestions, I've submitted a patch to GCC which
writes the format specified here with all the `bikeshed-` prefixes
removed (still haven't found the time to write a patch for Clang).

Here are some names for the format itself that we've brainstormed here:

  - sourcedep
  - srcdep
  - scandep
  - semdep (for "semantic dependency")

Personally, I'm partial to "semdep".

Let the bikeshedding begin :) .

--Ben


More information about the Tooling mailing list