[SG10] New draft of SD-6

Nelson, Clark clark.nelson at intel.com
Thu Mar 13 18:06:13 CET 2014


From: Ed Smith-Rowland [mailto:3dw4rd at verizon.net] 
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 5:56 PM

> Shouldn't __cpp_lib_shared_mutex be in the <shared_mutex> header rather than the <mutex> header?

I agree there's a problem with what I put in the draft, but moving the macro
is not the solution.

The question that needs to be answered is whether <shared_mutex> can be
included at all. So probably the test should use __has_include.

Clark


More information about the Features mailing list