[ub] An update on signed integers

Florian Weimer fw at deneb.enyo.de
Sun Apr 29 21:43:01 CEST 2018


* JF Bastien:

>>> Thanks.  Please change the name of the proposal.  Its contents is
>>> fine, but it doesn't really deliver two's complement signed integers.

> I’ll consider your request if you also provide a rationale for it.

Personally, I strongly associate two's complement integers with the
usual wraparound behavior and the lack of padding bits and trap
representations.


More information about the ub mailing list