[SG10] __cpp_lib_constexpr_functions
Nelson, Clark
clark.nelson at intel.com
Tue Aug 27 19:19:49 CEST 2013
> | So how do you think we should respond to Matt's feedback?
>
> Agree with Matt that in less than 10 years most of these macros
> will
> pointless. I think implementations are progressing faster that,
> what we
> had at comparable stage for C++98.
What I would like to know is what you think we should do this week. Should
we not recommend any macro for these constexpr functions?
Clark
More information about the Features
mailing list