<div dir="auto"><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Nov 13, 2019, 6:08 PM David Vandevoorde via Core <<a href="mailto:core@lists.isocpp.org">core@lists.isocpp.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
<br>
> On Nov 13, 2019, at 6:56 PM, Richard Smith via Core <<a href="mailto:core@lists.isocpp.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">core@lists.isocpp.org</a>> wrote:<br>
> <br>
> Hi core and SG10!<br>
> <br>
> (Noticed by Jens when reviewing the merge of CWG motion 8.)<br>
> <br>
> P1907R1 made significant changes to the behavior of non-type template parameters. It should have affected some feature-test macro, but didn't. Should we bump the version of __cpp_nontype_template_args or __cpp_nontype_template_parameter_class?<br>
<br>
<br>
A bump in __cpp_nontype_template_parameter_class seems appropriate to me.<br>
<br>
Daveed<br></blockquote></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">I agree. This is the one introduced by P0732. I'd emailed Jens on Friday to say the same but he missed the email.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Is this editorial or does this need to go through a paper/issue?</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Barry</div><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
</blockquote></div></div></div>