[SG10] SD-6: ready for C++17?

Aaron Ballman aaron at aaronballman.com
Thu Oct 12 03:46:41 CEST 2017


On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 8:00 PM, Nelson, Clark <clark.nelson at intel.com> wrote:
> I'm getting ready to take silence as assent: that the document is ready to be published as SD-6, and that no one minds if SD-6 differs from P0096R5 in the pre-Albuquerque mailing by (effectively) deleting the editor-notes.

I'm okay with this, thank you Clark!

~Aaron

>
> Clark
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: features-bounces at open-std.org [mailto:features-bounces at open-
>> std.org] On Behalf Of Nelson, Clark
>> Sent: Monday, October 09, 2017 10:41
>> To: features at isocpp.open-std.org <features at open-std.org>
>> Subject: Re: [SG10] SD-6: ready for C++17?
>>
>> I have posted another revision:
>>
>> http://wiki.edg.com/pub/Wg21albuquerque/SG10/sd-6.html
>>
>> The only technical changes have to do with P0135R1, but I have also
>> updated the section references from the C++17 table (and reordered a
>> few things to better match the revised section order).
>>
>>
>> I have been assuming that, in the revision of SD-6, the display of
>> editor-notes (at this point consisting almost entirely of indications
>> of missing examples) would be disabled by the style sheet.
>>
>> But I'm somewhat inclined to leave them enabled in the revision in
>> the pre-Albuquerque mailing (i.e. the one that EWG and LEWG will be
>> considering); IOW to tweak the style sheet after the content is
>> captured in the mailing.
>>
>> If you would be concerned about that course of action, please let me
>> know.
>>
>> Clark
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: John Spicer [mailto:jhs at edg.com]
>> > Sent: Monday, October 02, 2017 12:58
>> > To: Jonathan Wakely <cxx at kayari.org>
>> > Cc: Nelson, Clark <clark.nelson at intel.com>; features at isocpp.open-
>> > std.org <features at open-std.org>
>> > Subject: Re: [SG10] SD-6: ready for C++17?
>> >
>> > Me too.
>> >
>> > John.
>> >
>> >
>> >     On Oct 2, 2017, at 11:45 AM, Jonathan Wakely <cxx at kayari.org
>> > <mailto:cxx at kayari.org> > wrote:
>> >
>> >     Looks good to me.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >     On 29 September 2017 at 01:12, Nelson, Clark
>> > <clark.nelson at intel.com <mailto:clark.nelson at intel.com> > wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >             The pre-Albuquerque mailing is only about two weeks away,
>> > so I'd better stop sitting on this. Please see:
>> >
>> >             http://wiki.edg.com/pub/Wg21albuquerque/SG10/sd-6.html
>> > <http://wiki.edg.com/pub/Wg21albuquerque/SG10/sd-6.html>
>> >
>> >             My hope is to publish this as P0096R5 in the mailing, and
>> > then update SD-6 from that, preferably before the meeting (assuming
>> I
>> > hear no objections).
>> >
>> >             As always, the change indications are relative to the
>> > published SD-6. To make it easier to review recent technical
>> changes,
>> > the relevant papers are listed below.
>> >
>> >             There's one issue I'd like to specifically point out. For
>> > the new features added to the filesystem library, Jonathan
>> suggested
>> > updating the value of __cpp_lib_filesystem to 201703. In what I
>> have
>> > right now, two out of those three features are indicated by a value
>> > of 201606, just because that's the actual date of their adoption,
>> and
>> > only the third is 201703. If there is a consensus that they should
>> > all be lumped together under a single value, I'll change it, but so
>> > far there has been only one comment by one person. (And later it
>> > would be easier for me to erase the distinction than to restore
>> it.)
>> >
>> >             Would anyone have any issues with this as a new revision
>> > of SD-6?
>> >
>> >             Clark
>> >
>> >             N4230
>> >             N4366
>> >             N4387
>> >             N4510
>> >             P0024
>> >             P0028
>> >             P0032
>> >             P0040
>> >             P0074
>> >             P0127
>> >             P0220
>> >             P0254
>> >             P0283
>> >             P0295
>> >             P0307
>> >             P0336
>> >             P0371
>> >             P0386
>> >             P0394
>> >             P0618
>> >             Transactional Memory
>> >             _______________________________________________
>> >             Features mailing list
>> >             Features at isocpp.open-std.org <mailto:Features at isocpp.open-
>> > std.org>
>> >             http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
>> > <http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >     _______________________________________________
>> >     Features mailing list
>> >     Features at isocpp.open-std.org <mailto:Features at isocpp.open-
>> > std.org>
>> >     http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
>> >
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Features mailing list
>> Features at isocpp.open-std.org
>> http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
> _______________________________________________
> Features mailing list
> Features at isocpp.open-std.org
> http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features


More information about the Features mailing list