<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 18 October 2013 19:41, Nevin Liber <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nevin@eviloverlord.com" target="_blank">nevin@eviloverlord.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="im">On 18 October 2013 11:26, Ville Voutilainen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ville.voutilainen@gmail.com" target="_blank">ville.voutilainen@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
</div><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><div>Would anyone like to summarize the EWG issue people desire to raise? Just<br>
making the optional int types non-optional? Something further than that as well?<br></div><div>Nailing down CHAR_BIT? Anything else?</div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>Well, if we are going to start nailing things down, I'm all for totally ordering pointers with respect to operator<. </div>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
</font></span></div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br></font></span></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I'm all for people finding out how to submit non-paper issues to the EWG scribe and<br>then performing the actual submission. I'm much less for people assuming that the scribe<br>
will automatically create issues from chaotic email discussions. :D <br></div></div><br></div></div>