[SG10] New issue: <memory> and <execution> should define __cpp_lib_parallel_algorithm
Jonathan Wakely
cxx at kayari.org
Fri Jun 14 01:23:30 CEST 2019
Looks good, thanks.
On Thu, 13 Jun 2019 at 22:07, Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Am Mi., 12. Juni 2019 um 21:58 Uhr schrieb Jonathan Wakely <cxx at kayari.org
> >:
> >
> > There are parallel overloads of algorithms in <memory>, so it should
> define the macro. Also, <execution> defines the exec policies for use with
> the algos, so that should define the macro too.
> >
> > Proposed resolution:
> >
> > In [support.limits.general] add <memory> and <execution> to the table
> row for __cpp_lib_parallel_algorithm.
> >
> >
> > | __cpp_lib_parallel_algorithm |
> > | 201603L |
> > | <algorithm> <INS><execution> <memory</INS> <numeric> |
>
> A new issue has been created, please reload and double-check:
>
> https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3217
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Daniel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.open-std.org/pipermail/features/attachments/20190614/2fafc72a/attachment.html
More information about the Features
mailing list