[SG16-Unicode] New P/R for LWG 3328
Peter Brett
pbrett at cadence.com
Fri Nov 8 09:57:31 CET 2019
Hi all,
I think Jeff's proposed wording adequately resolves the NB comment.
Peter
From: unicode-bounces at open-std.org <unicode-bounces at open-std.org> On Behalf Of Billy O'Neal (VC LIBS)
Sent: 08 November 2019 08:56
To: Jeff Garland <jeff at crystalclearsoftware.com>; SG16 <unicode at open-std.org>
Subject: [SG16-Unicode] New P/R for LWG 3328
EXTERNAL MAIL
Hello Jeff and SG16.
In LWG today there were 4 concerns raised:
1. Historic => historical
2. Missing :: in the u8path reference
3. ISO rules forbid 'should' in notes.
4. The 'should in new code' form is somewhat 'preachy' and we should say why.
To those ends, how about this:
[Note: The example above is representative of a historical use of filesystem::u8path. Passing a std::u8string to path's constructor is preferred for an indication of UTF-8 encoding more consistent with path's handling of other encodings. -- end note.]
Billy3
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.open-std.org/pipermail/unicode/attachments/20191108/8d65c7f6/attachment-0001.html
More information about the Unicode
mailing list