[ub] new revision of p0593
Gabriel Dos Reis
gdr at microsoft.com
Mon Feb 12 04:29:27 CET 2018
Thank you for following through!
And taking care of the ‘memcpy’ and ‘memmove’ thingies.
When we say that the operations implicitly creates an object, are we also to require that the bits patterns there be valid object representation? That would impose a severe restriction…
From: ub-bounces at open-std.org [mailto:ub-bounces at open-std.org] On Behalf Of Richard Smith
Sent: Friday, February 9, 2018 11:52 AM
To: ub at open-std.org
Subject: [ub] new revision of p0593
Hi all,
Please find attached a revised version of P0593 based on the excellent discussion and feedback at the Albuquerque meeting. Please let me know if you have any comments; I believe our plan was to discuss this again at Jacksonville, and all being well, to forward it to EWG at that meeting.
Best regards,
Richard
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.open-std.org/pipermail/ub/attachments/20180212/0d78bce8/attachment-0001.html
More information about the ub
mailing list