[ub] An update on signed integers
Florian Weimer
fw at deneb.enyo.de
Sun Apr 29 21:43:01 CEST 2018
* JF Bastien:
>>> Thanks. Please change the name of the proposal. Its contents is
>>> fine, but it doesn't really deliver two's complement signed integers.
> I’ll consider your request if you also provide a rationale for it.
Personally, I strongly associate two's complement integers with the
usual wraparound behavior and the lack of padding bits and trap
representations.
More information about the ub
mailing list