[SG10] Draft: ready for the mid-term mailing?

W Brown webrown.cpp at gmail.com
Mon Jun 24 21:42:38 CEST 2013


On Jun 24, 2013, at 11:49 AM, Nelson, Clark wrote:

>> I don't like the idea of adding macros for these headers to
>> existing files.
> 
> That seems to be the point on which we need to measure consensus on the reflector.
> 
> To everyone: If you have an opinion on this point, please express it.

+1 for the __has_include solution, and +1 for only that solution.





More information about the Features mailing list