[SG10] Jacksonville additions

Jason Merrill jason at redhat.com
Thu Mar 10 15:38:48 CET 2016


On 03/10/2016 08:34 AM, Jens Maurer wrote:
> On 03/10/2016 01:41 PM, John Spicer wrote:
>> I’m wondering whether some of these should be updated values of existing macros.
>>
>> For example, capture of this and constexpr lambdas *could* be an update of __cpp_lambdas.
>
> Agreed, sounds more reasonable to me.

That means that you can't test for support of one without the other, but 
I guess that's OK.

Jason




More information about the Features mailing list