[ub] An update on signed integers

JF Bastien cxx at jfbastien.com
Sun Apr 29 20:35:42 CEST 2018


On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 11:33 AM John McFarlane <john at mcfarlane.name> wrote:

> The title looks fine to me but IIRC,
>
> > Data from Google suggesting that over 90% of all overflow is a bug
>
> refers specifically to unsigned wrapping.
>
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 10:47 AM Florian Weimer <fw at deneb.enyo.de> wrote:
>
>> * JF Bastien:
>>
>> > wg21.link/p0907
>>
>> Thanks.  Please change the name of the proposal.  Its contents is
>> fine, but it doesn't really deliver two's complement signed integers.
>
>
I’ll consider your request if you also provide a rationale for it.

>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.open-std.org/pipermail/ub/attachments/20180429/13a87fd8/attachment.html 


More information about the ub mailing list