[SG10] Jacksonville additions
Nelson, Clark
clark.nelson at intel.com
Thu Mar 10 23:10:16 CET 2016
> On 03/10/2016 01:41 PM, John Spicer wrote:
> > I’m wondering whether some of these should be updated values of
> existing macros.
> >
> > For example, capture of this and constexpr lambdas *could* be an
> update of __cpp_lambdas.
>
> Agreed, sounds more reasonable to me.
I can see how the ability to add "constexpr" to a lambda might be
considered just a tweak. But, for example, we already have
__cpp_generic_lambdas.
A new kind of capture seems to me to be a different sort of thing.
And, for example, we already have __cpp_init_captures.
Clark
More information about the Features
mailing list