[SG10] __cpp_deduction_guides for P0091?

Richard Smith richard at metafoo.co.uk
Tue Feb 14 01:57:07 CET 2017


I'd like to suggest we bump this to 201611 for P0512R0 (GCC uses 201606 for
P0091, which has somewhat different semantics). Seem OK?

On 5 October 2016 at 10:18, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk> wrote:

> Sounds good to me.
>
> On 5 Oct 2016 7:54 am, "Jason Merrill" <jason at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> We may not need a feature-test macro for the class template
>> placeholder feature, but we do need one for library vendors to guard
>> deduction guide declarations with.  How about __cpp_deduction_guides?
>>
>> Jason
>> _______________________________________________
>> Features mailing list
>> Features at isocpp.open-std.org
>> http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.open-std.org/pipermail/features/attachments/20170213/fb758006/attachment.html 


More information about the Features mailing list