[SG10] P0074R0: Making std::owner_less more flexible
Nelson, Clark
clark.nelson at intel.com
Tue Feb 23 22:57:32 CET 2016
> I’m not sure what, if any, is the process required/desired of such
> updates.
As established at the Urbana meeting, the process is that the consensus we
need is of SG10, not WG21.
My personal preference is that we would do every update from a WG21
document. But I'd also prefer that the published SD-6 not have any glaring
errors.
The question is whether we have consensus within SG10 which principle
should take precedence.
> If there is no required process, then the attachment seems better
> than P0996R1.
Noted, thanks.
Clark
More information about the Features
mailing list