<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Nelson, Clark <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:clark.nelson@intel.com" target="_blank">clark.nelson@intel.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">> All the variant changes from Oulu should be covered by<br>
> __has_include(<variant>); I don't think we have a need to track them<br>
> separately unless someone chooses to produce a <variant> header that<br>
> doesn't match the contents of any working draft.<br>
<br>
I note that you don't mention the changes to "any" or "optional". Should I<br>
infer that you think those changes deserve a macro, even though the<br>
previous state appeared in only one WD?</blockquote><div><br></div><div>I'd be happy not adding a macro for those either if no-one has shipped the previous version yet. (And if they already have, I think we'd need to discuss this, but it's still probably also appropriate to not add a macro.)</div></div></div></div>