[ub] Sized integer types and char bits

Ville Voutilainen ville.voutilainen at gmail.com
Fri Oct 18 18:52:08 CEST 2013


On 18 October 2013 19:41, Nevin Liber <nevin at eviloverlord.com> wrote:

> On 18 October 2013 11:26, Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> Would anyone like to summarize the EWG issue people desire to raise? Just
>> making the optional int types non-optional? Something further than that
>> as well?
>> Nailing down CHAR_BIT? Anything else?
>>
>
> Well, if we are going to start nailing things down, I'm all for totally
> ordering pointers with respect to operator<.
>
>
I'm all for people finding out how to submit non-paper issues to the EWG
scribe and
then performing the actual submission. I'm much less for people assuming
that the scribe
will automatically create issues from chaotic email discussions. :D
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.open-std.org/pipermail/ub/attachments/20131018/5b50b211/attachment.html 


More information about the ub mailing list