[SG10] __cpp_lib_constexpr_functions
Nelson, Clark
clark.nelson at intel.com
Tue Aug 27 19:45:35 CEST 2013
> My instance on having few macros isn't just specific to constexpr.
>
> For 'constexpr' in particular, I do believe it is still too early.
> LWG
> doesn't even know what it wants. Having a new macro everytime that
> LWG
> changes its mind sound overkill. If the desire is to have a macro
> anyway, then I will repeat the suggestion I made previously: Have
> just one
> macro for constexpr, call it something, and have its value updated
> for
> new released of the committee draft.
Gaby, I don't understand what you're suggesting we should do.
Here is the relevant excerpt from N3694:
N3471<http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2012/n3471.html>
Constexpr Library Additions: utilities
20.2-20.4
__cpp_lib_constexpr_functions<file:///C:\Users\cnelson1\Documents\j16\2013-07\n3694.htm#detail.cpp14.n3471>
201210
<utility>
N3469<http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2012/n3469.html>
Constexpr Library Additions: chrono
20.11
<chrono>
N3470<http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2012/n3470.html>
Constexpr Library Additions: containers
23.3
<array>
What are your proposed edits, if any?
Clark
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.open-std.org/pipermail/features/attachments/20130827/3effa6f4/attachment-0001.html
More information about the Features
mailing list