<div dir="ltr">On 31 October 2013 04:16, Christopher Jefferson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:chris@bubblescope.net" target="_blank">chris@bubblescope.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br><br>
Her suggested fix is to introduce a new notation for constructors<br>
which means "I am not initialising this member on purpose". This will<br>
allow compilers to then add a warning at a high warning level that a<br>
member is missed from a constructor.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Had I a time machine, this would be my preference (not just missing members, but all uninitialized variables). But I agree with Ville that this would break backwards compatibility.<br>
<br></div><div>On the other hand, maybe adding an attribute would help?<br clear="all"></div></div>-- <br> Nevin ":-)" Liber <mailto:<a href="mailto:nevin@eviloverlord.com" target="_blank">nevin@eviloverlord.com</a>> (847) 691-1404
</div></div>