[Tooling] [isocpp-modules] Dependency format with module details implementation

Boris Kolpackov boris at codesynthesis.com
Thu Apr 11 12:36:03 CEST 2019


Gabriel Dos Reis via Modules <modules at lists.isocpp.org> writes:

> By the definitions, they are not modules.  They don't have names other
> than the name of the header or header file.  They don't provide anything
> other than their content as a whole.

They may not look like modules from the language POV, but for build
mechanics they look very much like real modules. Worse, in fact,
since their BMIs have to be available earlier.


More information about the Tooling mailing list