[SG10] Meeting 04-06
Richard Smith
richard at metafoo.co.uk
Wed Mar 25 18:25:06 CET 2015
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Nevin Liber <nevin at eviloverlord.com> wrote:
> On 24 March 2015 at 01:36, Jens Maurer <Jens.Maurer at gmx.net> wrote:
>
>> Should TSes use the macro spelling pattern
>>
>> __cpp_experimental_whatever
>>
>> or
>>
>> __cpp_whatever
>>
>> assuming that the value of the macro will change anyway when a feature
>> moves from TS land to the standard proper?
>>
>
> I'd rather that __cpp_experimental_whatever be reserved for library
> features that are going into namespace std::experimental.
>
> A different spelling for experimental language features is fine by me.
>
I would think that std::experimental names should be given
__cpp_lib_experimental_* macros, and __cpp_experimental_* should be
reserved for experimental language features (if we ever want to include
"experimental" in such a feature name).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.open-std.org/pipermail/features/attachments/20150325/79994ed1/attachment.html
More information about the Features
mailing list