[SG10] SD-6 macro name stability.
Ed Smith-Rowland
3dw4rd at verizon.net
Sat May 31 15:07:40 CEST 2014
Greetings,
I should have asked this earlier but I was wondering based on the most
recent iteration how stable the macro names are?
I know the __cpp_lib_has_* are questionable. But I'd like to know if
the names on the currently posted SD-6 are stable.
I ask because i just posted a patch for gcc that is being reviewed.
I'm going to wait until after the next meeting before I patch for
__has_cpp_attribute and the above macros.
Thanks,
Ed
More information about the Features
mailing list