[SG10] P0272: non-const string data

Jens Maurer Jens.Maurer at gmx.net
Sat Mar 12 10:53:03 CET 2016


On 03/12/2016 02:13 AM, Nevin ":-)" Liber <Nevin :-) Liber wrote:
> On Mar 11, 2016, at 4:02 PM, Jens Maurer <Jens.Maurer at gmx.net> wrote:
>>
>> For
>>   s.data()
>>
>> the workaround is something like
>>
>>   &s[0]
>>
>> (Both const and non-const.)
> 
> It's slightly worse:
> 
> v.empty() ? nullptr : &v.front()


Thanks for the correction.  I still think we don't need a macro
for a user to enable non-substantial syntactic sugar.

Jens


More information about the Features mailing list