<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Agustín K-ballo Bergé <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kaballo86@hotmail.com" target="_blank">kaballo86@hotmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On 2/2/2015 9:35 PM, Nelson, Clark wrote:<br>
> Apologies, especially to Ed, for the long silence.<br>
><br>
> Here is an updated document.<br>
<br>
</span>Apologies for coming late to the party (I have just subscribed to the<br>
reflector), but why was `__cpp_digit_separators` removed?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Because there is no reasonable way that code can use it to adapt to the presence or absence of the feature.</div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Furthermore, N4277 (TriviallyCopyable reference_wrapper) has a<br>
question-mark next to "none". I see no reason for a macro for this<br>
feature, as it is intended to be detected via the corresponding trait.<br>
Incidentally, I was the author of such paper.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">--<br>
Agustín K-ballo Bergé.-<br>
<a href="http://talesofcpp.fusionfenix.com" target="_blank">http://talesofcpp.fusionfenix.com</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Features mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Features@isocpp.open-std.org">Features@isocpp.open-std.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features" target="_blank">http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features</a><br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div></div>