<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 8:39 AM Jason Merrill <<a href="mailto:jason@redhat.com">jason@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 9:36 PM Richard Smith <<a href="mailto:richard@metafoo.co.uk" target="_blank">richard@metafoo.co.uk</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
>> - <=> != == (should bump both the class nttp macro, and the 3-way comparison macro)<br>
><br>
> Yes, we should do something about this. Per the above I think we should take a holistic view for <=> feature macros. Bumping the class type NTTP macro makes sense to me. Does any vendor advertise the old value yet?<br>
<br>
G++ does.<br>
<br>
Jason<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Arguably, it shouldn't though? That version of NTTP is based on defaulted operator<=>, and g++ doesn't implement operator<=> yet. <br></div><div><br></div><div>Barry<br></div></div></div>