<div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="auto">On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 11:33 AM John McFarlane <<a href="mailto:john@mcfarlane.name">john@mcfarlane.name</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div>The title looks fine to me but IIRC, <br><br>> Data from Google suggesting that over 90% of all overflow is a bug<br><br></div>refers specifically to unsigned wrapping.</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"></div><div class="gmail_quote"><div>On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 10:47 AM Florian Weimer <<a href="mailto:fw@deneb.enyo.de" target="_blank">fw@deneb.enyo.de</a>> wrote:<br></div></div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">* JF Bastien:<br>
<br>
> wg21.link/p0907<br>
<br>
Thanks. Please change the name of the proposal. Its contents is<br>
fine, but it doesn't really deliver two's complement signed integers.</blockquote></div></blockquote><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">I’ll consider your request if you also provide a rationale for it. </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"></blockquote></div></blockquote></div></div>