[ub] Sized integer types and char bits
Nevin Liber
nevin at eviloverlord.com
Fri Oct 18 18:41:00 CEST 2013
On 18 October 2013 11:26, Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen at gmail.com>wrote:
>
> Would anyone like to summarize the EWG issue people desire to raise? Just
> making the optional int types non-optional? Something further than that as
> well?
> Nailing down CHAR_BIT? Anything else?
>
Well, if we are going to start nailing things down, I'm all for totally
ordering pointers with respect to operator<.
--
Nevin ":-)" Liber <mailto:nevin at eviloverlord.com> (847) 691-1404
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.open-std.org/pipermail/ub/attachments/20131018/4e787378/attachment.html
More information about the ub
mailing list