[SG16-Unicode] Feedback on P1097R1: U+NNNNNN syntax

Tom Honermann tom at honermann.net
Fri Jul 6 23:31:31 CEST 2018


On 07/06/2018 05:16 PM, Hubert Tong wrote:
> I am wondering if accepting U+(4-6 hex digits) in \N{...} as Perl does 
> can be considered.

It certainly can be, but what is the motivation given that we already 
have \u and \U?  Why is supporting both \u1234 and \N{U+1234} helpful?

Tom.


More information about the Unicode mailing list