[SG16-Unicode] New P/R for LWG 3328

Jeff Garland jeff at crystalclearsoftware.com
Fri Nov 8 10:17:21 CET 2019


Thanks Peter — Billy — maybe a slightly shorter version removing the ‘indication of’?

> [Note: The example above is representative of a historical use of filesystem::u8path. Passing a std::u8string is preferred for a UTF-8 encoding more consistent with path’s handling of other encodings. -- end note.]




> On Nov 8, 2019, at 2:01 AM, Billy O'Neal (VC LIBS) <bion at microsoft.com> wrote:
> 
> Ah, thank you 😊
>  
> From: Peter Brett <pbrett at cadence.com>
> Sent: Friday, November 8, 2019 9:01:27 AM
> To: Billy O'Neal (VC LIBS) <bion at microsoft.com>; Jeff Garland <jeff at crystalclearsoftware.com>; SG16 <unicode at open-std.org>
> Subject: RE: New P/R for LWG 3328
>  
> Sorry, my bad – s/Jeff/Billy/ in my e-mail.  I meant that I was happy with the changed wording to address LWG concerns.
>  
>               Peter
>  
> From: Billy O'Neal (VC LIBS) <bion at microsoft.com> 
> Sent: 08 November 2019 09:00
> To: Peter Brett <pbrett at cadence.com>; Jeff Garland <jeff at crystalclearsoftware.com>; SG16 <unicode at open-std.org>
> Subject: RE: New P/R for LWG 3328
>  
> EXTERNAL MAIL
> 
> That might be the case, but LWG wanted changes before they were willing to merge it, hence my message.
>  
> Billy3
>  
> From: Peter Brett <pbrett at cadence.com <mailto:pbrett at cadence.com>>
> Sent: Friday, November 8, 2019 8:57:31 AM
> To: Billy O'Neal (VC LIBS) <bion at microsoft.com <mailto:bion at microsoft.com>>; Jeff Garland <jeff at crystalclearsoftware.com <mailto:jeff at crystalclearsoftware.com>>; SG16 <unicode at open-std.org <mailto:unicode at open-std.org>>
> Subject: RE: New P/R for LWG 3328
>  
> Hi all,
>  
> I think Jeff’s proposed wording adequately resolves the NB comment.
>  
>              Peter
>  
> From: unicode-bounces at open-std.org <mailto:unicode-bounces at open-std.org> <unicode-bounces at open-std.org <mailto:unicode-bounces at open-std.org>> On Behalf Of Billy O'Neal (VC LIBS)
> Sent: 08 November 2019 08:56
> To: Jeff Garland <jeff at crystalclearsoftware.com <mailto:jeff at crystalclearsoftware.com>>; SG16 <unicode at open-std.org <mailto:unicode at open-std.org>>
> Subject: [SG16-Unicode] New P/R for LWG 3328
>  
> EXTERNAL MAIL
> 
> Hello Jeff and SG16.
>  
> In LWG today there were 4 concerns raised:
> Historic => historical
> Missing :: in the u8path reference
> ISO rules forbid ‘should’ in notes.
> The ‘should in new code’ form is somewhat ‘preachy’ and we should say why.
>  
> To those ends, how about this:
>  
> [Note: The example above is representative of a historical use of filesystem::u8path. Passing a std::u8string to path’s constructor is preferred for an indication of UTF-8 encoding more consistent with path’s handling of other encodings. -- end note.]
>  
> Billy3

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.open-std.org/pipermail/unicode/attachments/20191108/6d1ae6ef/attachment.html 


More information about the Unicode mailing list