[SG10] Jacksonville additions

John Spicer jhs at edg.com
Thu Mar 10 13:41:24 CET 2016


I’m wondering whether some of these should be updated values of existing macros.

For example, capture of this and constexpr lambdas *could* be an update of __cpp_lambdas.   I’d be interested in hearing opinions on which is the better direction.

John.


> On Mar 9, 2016, at 8:12 PM, Nelson, Clark <clark.nelson at intel.com> wrote:
> 
> I have made a start at the additions we will need to make to SD-6 to reflect
> the JAX meeting; the result is attached.
> 
> I am specifically soliciting comments on everything in the document that
> involves a question mark.
> 
> --
> Clark Nelson            Chair, PL22.16 (ANSI C++ standard committee)
> Intel Corporation       Chair, SG10 (C++ SG for feature-testing)
> clark.nelson at intel.com  Chair, CPLEX (C SG for parallel language extensions)
> <jacksonville.html>_______________________________________________
> Features mailing list
> Features at isocpp.open-std.org
> http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features



More information about the Features mailing list