[SG10] Updates to SD-6
Nelson, Clark
clark.nelson at intel.com
Mon Jan 5 19:37:02 CET 2015
> >> For N3928 Extending static_assert why not just bump up the date
> on __cpp_static_assert?
> >
> > Yeah, that's definitely worth considering. The change is a
> pretty minor
> > tweak. (The recommendations I included for this were the ones
> provided
> > in N3928 -- thanks, Walter.)
>
> You're welcome, but I wish I had thought of Ed's suggestion.
> Unless anyone objects, I recommend we adopt it, as (1) I like it
> better than any of mine, and (2) doing so seems entirely
> consistent with our document:
Since Walter has now repudiated his original proposals, I have deleted them from the draft. Thanks, Ed.
Clark
More information about the Features
mailing list