[ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor

James Dennett jdennett at google.com
Thu Oct 17 05:54:54 CEST 2013


On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 10/16/2013 07:49 PM, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
>> For the preprocessor, I would rather not see undiagnosed differences in
>> behavior.  Wouldn't it be best to simply poll the vendors and see if
>> they are okay with standardizing on "UCN from splicing"?
>
> Agreed.  UCNs are new, we don't need to accommodate variance in existing
> practice here.

UCNs or UDLs?

-- James


More information about the ub mailing list