[Tooling] Modules feedback

JF Bastien cxx at jfbastien.com
Wed Feb 13 16:26:14 CET 2019


On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 7:07 AM Ben Boeckel <ben.boeckel at kitware.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 14:01:34 -0800, JF Bastien wrote:
> > I'm confused as to why headers suddenly stop working.
>
> Because if, as a project, I port over to modules, I *still* have to
> maintain headers? I may as well not do modules at all at that point just
> due to maintenance costs.


Seems something a tool can do, if I understand what you have in mind.



> > > We need an intermediate representation that is *portable*.
> > >>
> > >
> > We do?
>
> For projects which don't build zlib++ (as a strawman) as part of their
> build and instead assume that there is one provided by the system, yes.


I don’t think that’s true, based on what my platform offers.




> --Ben
> _______________________________________________
> Tooling mailing list
> Tooling at isocpp.open-std.org
> http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/tooling
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.open-std.org/pipermail/tooling/attachments/20190213/3d09a772/attachment.html 


More information about the Tooling mailing list