[ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor

Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at gmail.com
Thu Oct 17 07:03:10 CEST 2013


2013/10/17 James Dennett <jdennett at google.com>:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 10/16/2013 07:49 PM, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
>>> For the preprocessor, I would rather not see undiagnosed differences in
>>> behavior.  Wouldn't it be best to simply poll the vendors and see if
>>> they are okay with standardizing on "UCN from splicing"?
>>
>> Agreed.  UCNs are new, we don't need to accommodate variance in existing
>> practice here.
>
> UCNs or UDLs?

I don't know why, but if I see "UDL" I always read this as
"user-defined language" ;-)

- Daniel


More information about the ub mailing list