[SG10] SD-6 macro name stability.

Ed Smith-Rowland 3dw4rd at verizon.net
Sat May 31 15:07:40 CEST 2014


Greetings,

I should have asked this earlier but I was wondering based on the most 
recent iteration how stable the macro names are?

I know the __cpp_lib_has_* are questionable.  But I'd like to know if 
the names on the currently posted SD-6 are stable.

I ask because i just posted a patch for gcc that is being reviewed.

I'm going to wait until after the next meeting before I patch for 
__has_cpp_attribute and the above macros.

Thanks,

Ed



More information about the Features mailing list