<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">Thanks for this Ville. It is always interesting to learn about different slices of the C++ community.<br><br>On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 3:41 PM, Ville Voutilainen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ville.voutilainen@gmail.com" target="_blank">ville.voutilainen@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><span style="color:rgb(34,34,34)">I'm not suggesting that we should never make breaking changes. I am</span><br></div></div>
suggesting that we should have bloody strong and good<br>
reasons for them, and "this was found to be confusing to some users<br>
here and there" doesn't even begin to cut it, and<br>
"you can migrate with a tool" is an answer that gets laughed/scoffed<br>
at or derided in my usual stomping grounds.<br></blockquote><div><br>How would folks react in your usual stomping grounds to the addition of a 'std::ranges::sort' function that works on iterators, but is only slightly and subtly different from 'std::sort'? What if there's a third sort, 'std::we_really_got_it_right_this_time::sort', to add to the mix? Similarly, how would they react to having a 'std::vector', 'std::pmr::vector', and possibly a 'std2::vector'? Are these acceptable for these folks?<br><br>Thanks,<br><br>David</div></div></div></div>