[ub] Proposal: make self-initialized references ill-formed (C++17?)
John Zwinck
jzwinck at gmail.com
Sat Sep 13 15:52:07 CEST 2014
I recently happened upon some code which, boiled down to its essence, was
like this:
for (int ii = 0; ii < 1; ++ii)
{
const std::string& str = str; // !!
std::cout << str << std::endl;
}
My to my surprise, this code compiled (and produced a segfault at runtime).
I say surprise because I had all warnings enabled (as errors) in GCC 4.7
and 4.9, yet there was no complaint. I got a good answer from Jonathan
Wakely (http://stackoverflow.com/a/25720743/4323) explaining why GCC failed
to catch it, but this got me thinking: why does C++ allow this at all?
So, a proposal: perhaps in C++17 we could declare that self-initialized
references are ill-formed. I did consider whether this might impact
existing code; the only use case that came to mind might be SFINAE, though
I surely have never seen it used that way.
I would appreciate any thoughts on this, and hope I have come to the right
place to discuss it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.open-std.org/pipermail/ub/attachments/20140913/6447510c/attachment.html
More information about the ub
mailing list