Name
	n3577 - Rename s/uimaxabs/umaxabs/

Category
	Naming consistency

Author
	Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>

History
	<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/src/alx/alx/wg14/alx-0015.git/>

	r0 (2025-05-09):
	-  Initial draft.

Description
	The name of uimaxabs(3) is inconsistent with pre-existing APIs
	such as strtoumax(3) and wcstoull(3).

	Other non-standard APIs also use a similar pattern, where the
	'u' substitutes the 'i', and doesn't prepend it.

	glibc has already implemented uimaxabs(3) under the feature test
	macro _ISOC2Y_SOURCE, but that marks it as experimental, and
	users of that API should be aware that it's still experimental.
	glibc is free to provide the old name for compatibility, or drop
	the name completely.  I ignore if other vendors already
	implement it, but the conclusion would be the same.

	Naming consistency is important, even though it seems like a
	trivial matter that some don't consider worth of a minute of
	their time.  We should make sure that the experience for
	programmers is smooth, and that names follow conventions as
	much as possible, which reduces surprises.

Proposed wording
	Based on N3550.

	s/uimaxabs/umaxabs/g