Defect Report #413

Previous Defect Report < - > Next Defect Report


Submitter: Willem Wakker
Submission Date: 2012-01-27
Source: WG14
Reference Document: N1601
Version: 1.2
Date: April 2013
Subject: initialization

Summary

Consider the following code:
typedef struct {
int k;
int l;
int a[2];
} T;

typedef struct {
int i;
T t;
} S;

T x = {.l = 43, .k = 42, .a[1] = 19, .a[0] = 18 };

void f(void)
{
S l = { 1, .t = x, .t.l = 41, .t.a[1] = 17};
}

The question is: what is now the value of l.t.k? Is it 42 (due to the initialization of .t = x) or is it 0 (due to the fact that .t.l starts an incomplete initialization of .t?

The relevant clause from the standard is 6.7.9 clause 19:
19 The initialization shall occur in initializer list order, each initializer provided for a particular subobject overriding any previously listed initializer for the same subobject;151) all subobjects that are not initialized explicitly shall be initialized implicitly the same as objects that have static storage duration.

Suggested Technical Corrigendum


Feb 2012 Meeting

Committee Discussion

Oct 2012 meeting

Committee Discussion

Apr 2013 meeting

Committee Discussion

  • There was no work performed on this DR.
  • Although both GCC and six compilers from IBM provide the unintended answer, it is believed to be such a rarely used feature that it is not depended upon to a great degree, and the compiler venders are willing to change their behavior appropriately.

  • Previous Defect Report < - > Next Defect Report