Doc. no.: | P0849R3 |
Date: | 2020-2-29 |
Audience: | EWG, LWG |
Reply-to: | Zhihao Yuan <zy at miator dot net> |
auto(x): decay-copy in the language
Changes Since R2
- dropped
decltype(auto)(x)
in comply with EWG’s opinion
Changes Since R1
- propose
decltype(auto)(x)
as well
Changes Since R0
- updated examples
- discussed
decltype(auto)(x)
- added library wording
Introduction
This paper proposes auto(x)
and auto{x}
for casting x
into a prvalue value as if passing x
as a function argument by value. The functionality is realized as the decay-copy
function in the standard for exposition only.
Motivation
Obtaining a prvalue copy is necessary
A generic way to obtain a copy of an object in C++ is auto a = x;
but such a copy is an lvalue. We could often convey the purpose in code more accurately if we can obtain a copy as a prvalue. In the following example, let Container
be a concept,
void pop_front_alike(Container auto& x) {
std::erase(x.begin(), x.end(), auto(x.front()));
}
If we wrote
void pop_front_alike(Container auto& x) {
auto a = x.front();
std::erase(x.begin(), x.end(), a);
}
, questions arise – why this is not equivalent to
void pop_front_alike(Container auto& x) {
std::erase(x.begin(), x.end(), x.front());
}
The problem is, the statement to obtain an lvalue copy is a declaration:
auto a = x.front();
Its primary purpose is to declare a variable while being a copy is a property of the declaration. In contrast, the expression to obtain an rvalue copy is a clear command to perform a copy:
auto(x.front())
One might argue that the above is indifferent from
T(x.front())
However, there are plenty of situations that the T
is nontrivial to get. We probably don’t want to write the original example as
void pop_front_alike(Container auto& x) {
using T = std::decay_t<decltype(x.front())>;
std::erase(x.begin(), x.end(), T(x.front()));
}
Obtaining a prvalue copy with auto(x)
works always
In standard library specification, we use the following exposition only function to fulfill the role of auto(x)
:
template<class T>
constexpr decay_t<T> decay_copy(T&& v) noexcept(
is_nothrow_convertible_v<T, decay_t<T>>) {
return std::forward<T>(v);
}
This definition involves templates, dependent constexpr
, forwarding reference, noexcept
, and two traits, and still has caveats if people want to use it in practice. An obvious issue is that decay_copy(x.front())
creates a copy of x.front()
even if x.front()
is already a prvalue (thus, already a copy).
There is a less obvious issue which needs a minimal reproduce:
class A {
int x;
public:
A();
auto run() {
f(A(*this));
f(auto(*this));
f(decay_copy(*this));
}
protected:
A(const A&);
};
The problem is that decay_copy
is nobody’s friend. We can use A
directly in this specific example. Still, in a more general setting, where a type A
has access to a set of type T
's private or protected copy/move constructors, decay-copy
an object of T
fails inside A
's class scope, but auto(x)
continues to work.
Discussion
auto(x)
is a missing piece
Replacing the char
in char('a')
with auto
, we obtain auto('a')
, which is a function-style cast. Such a formula also supports injected-class-names and class template argument deduction in C++17. Introducing auto(x)
and auto{x}
significantly improves the language consistency:
variable definition |
function-style cast |
new expression |
auto v(x); |
auto(x) |
new auto(x) |
auto v{x}; |
auto{x} |
new auto{x} |
ClassTemplate v(x); |
ClassTemplate(x) |
new ClassTemplate(x) |
ClassTemplate v{x}; |
ClassTemplate{x} |
new ClassTemplate{x} |
** The type of x
is a specialization of ClassTemplate
.
With this proposal, all the cells in the table copy construct form x
(given CTAD’s default behavior) to obtain lvalues, prvalues, and pointers to objects, categorized by their columns. Defining auto(x)
as a library facility loses orthogonality.
Introducing auto(x)
into the language even improves the library consistency:
type function style |
expression style |
void_t<decltype(expr)> |
decltype(void(expr)) |
decay_t<decltype(expr)> |
decltype(auto(expr)) |
Do we also miss decltype(auto){x}
?
decltype(auto){arg}
can forward arg
without computing arg
's type. It is equivalent to static_cast<decltype(arg)>(arg)
. If arg
is a variable of type T&&
, arg
is an lvalue but static_cast<T&&>(arg)
is an xvalue.
EWG discussed this idea, disliked its expert-friendly nature, and concluded that adding this facility would cause the teaching effort to add up.
Implementation
Try it out: Godbolt
Wording
The wording is relative to N4849.
Modify 7.6.1.3 [expr.type.conv]/1 as indicated:
A simple-type-specifier (9.2.8.2) or typename-specifier (13.8) followed by a parenthesized optional expression-list or by a braced-init-list (the initializer) constructs a value of the specified type given the initializer. If the type is a placeholder for a deduced class type, it is replaced by the return type of the function selected by
overload resolution for class template deduction (12.4.1.8) for the remainder of this section. Otherwise, if the type is auto
, it is replaced by the type deduced for the variable x
in the invented
declaration (9.2.8.5):
auto x init;
, where init is the initializer.
Modify 9.2.8.5 [dcl.spec.auto]/5 as indicated:
A placeholder type can also be used in the type-specifier-seq in the new-type-id or type-id of a new-expression
(7.6.2.7) and as a decl-specifier of the parameter-declaration’s decl-specifier-seq in a template-parameter
(13.2). The auto
type-specifier can also be used as the simple-type-specifier in an explicit type conversion (functional notation) (7.6.1.3).
Remove the first entity from 16.4.2.1 [expos.only.func]/2:
template<class T> constexpr decay_t<T> decay-copy(T&& v)
noexcept(is_nothrow_convertible_v<T, decay_t<T>>) // exposition only
{ return std::forward<T>(v); }
Search and replace “calls to decay-copy
being evaluated in” (the thread/the current thread) with “where the values produced by auto
are materialized in”.
Search and replace “decay-copy
” with “auto
”.
Acknowledgments
Thank Alisdair Meredith, Arthur O’Dwyer, and Billy O’Neal for providing examples and feedback for this paper. Thank James Touton for presenting the paper and bringing it forward.
References
auto(x): decay-copy in the language
Changes Since R2
decltype(auto)(x)
in comply with EWG’s opinionChanges Since R1
decltype(auto)(x)
as wellChanges Since R0
decltype(auto)(x)
Introduction
This paper proposes
auto(x)
andauto{x}
for castingx
into a prvalue value as if passingx
as a function argument by value. The functionality is realized as thedecay-copy
function in the standard for exposition only.Motivation
Obtaining a prvalue copy is necessary
A generic way to obtain a copy of an object in C++ is
auto a = x;
but such a copy is an lvalue. We could often convey the purpose in code more accurately if we can obtain a copy as a prvalue. In the following example, letContainer
be a concept,void pop_front_alike(Container auto& x) { std::erase(x.begin(), x.end(), auto(x.front())); }
If we wrote
void pop_front_alike(Container auto& x) { auto a = x.front(); std::erase(x.begin(), x.end(), a); }
, questions arise – why this is not equivalent to
void pop_front_alike(Container auto& x) { std::erase(x.begin(), x.end(), x.front()); }
The problem is, the statement to obtain an lvalue copy is a declaration:
auto a = x.front();
Its primary purpose is to declare a variable while being a copy is a property of the declaration. In contrast, the expression to obtain an rvalue copy is a clear command to perform a copy:
auto(x.front())
One might argue that the above is indifferent from
T(x.front())
However, there are plenty of situations that the
T
is nontrivial to get. We probably don’t want to write the original example asvoid pop_front_alike(Container auto& x) { using T = std::decay_t<decltype(x.front())>; std::erase(x.begin(), x.end(), T(x.front())); }
Obtaining a prvalue copy with
auto(x)
works alwaysIn standard library specification, we use the following exposition only function to fulfill the role of
auto(x)
:template<class T> constexpr decay_t<T> decay_copy(T&& v) noexcept( is_nothrow_convertible_v<T, decay_t<T>>) { return std::forward<T>(v); }
This definition involves templates, dependent
constexpr
, forwarding reference,noexcept
, and two traits, and still has caveats if people want to use it in practice. An obvious issue is thatdecay_copy(x.front())
creates a copy ofx.front()
even ifx.front()
is already a prvalue (thus, already a copy).There is a less obvious issue which needs a minimal reproduce:
class A { int x; public: A(); auto run() { f(A(*this)); // ok f(auto(*this)); // ok as proposed f(decay_copy(*this)); // ill-formed } protected: A(const A&); };
The problem is that
decay_copy
is nobody’s friend. We can useA
directly in this specific example. Still, in a more general setting, where a typeA
has access to a set of typeT
's private or protected copy/move constructors,decay-copy
an object ofT
fails insideA
's class scope, butauto(x)
continues to work.Discussion
auto(x)
is a missing pieceReplacing the
char
inchar('a')
withauto
, we obtainauto('a')
, which is a function-style cast. Such a formula also supports injected-class-names and class template argument deduction in C++17. Introducingauto(x)
andauto{x}
significantly improves the language consistency:** The type of
x
is a specialization ofClassTemplate
.With this proposal, all the cells in the table copy construct form
x
(given CTAD’s default behavior) to obtain lvalues, prvalues, and pointers to objects, categorized by their columns. Definingauto(x)
as a library[1] facility loses orthogonality.Introducing
auto(x)
into the language even improves the library consistency:Do we also miss
decltype(auto){x}
?decltype(auto){arg}
can forwardarg
without computingarg
's type. It is equivalent tostatic_cast<decltype(arg)>(arg)
. Ifarg
is a variable of typeT&&
,arg
is an lvalue butstatic_cast<T&&>(arg)
is an xvalue.EWG discussed this idea, disliked its expert-friendly nature, and concluded that adding this facility would cause the teaching effort to add up.
Implementation
Try it out: Godbolt
Wording
The wording is relative to N4849.
Modify 7.6.1.3 [expr.type.conv]/1 as indicated:
Modify 9.2.8.5 [dcl.spec.auto]/5 as indicated:
Remove the first entity from 16.4.2.1 [expos.only.func]/2:
Search and replace “
calls to” (the thread/the current thread) with “where the values produced bydecay-copy
being evaluated inauto
are materialized in”.Search and replace “
” with “decay-copy
auto
”.Acknowledgments
Thank Alisdair Meredith, Arthur O’Dwyer, and Billy O’Neal for providing examples and feedback for this paper. Thank James Touton for presenting the paper and bringing it forward.
References
Krügler, Daniel. P0758R0 Implicit conversion traits and utility functions. http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2017/p0758r0.html ↩︎