This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of New status.
<iostream>
on initialization are not yet precisely specifiedSection: 31.4.2 [iostream.objects.overview] Status: New Submitter: Jiang An Opened: 2023-03-27 Last modified: 2023-03-27
Priority: 4
View all other issues in [iostream.objects.overview].
View all issues with New status.
Discussion:
LWG 3878 specified the effects of importing standard library modules on initialization.
However, the effects of including <iostream>
are not yet precisely specified.
A hostile reading may consider this to allow the ios_base::Init
variable to be
a function-local static variable or an inline variable, which defeats the purpose.
[2023-05-24; Reflector poll]
Set priority to 4 after reflector poll.
Proposed resolution:
This wording is relative to N4944.
Change 31.4.2 [iostream.objects.overview]/5 as indicated:
-5- The results of including
<iostream>
in a translation unit shall be as if<iostream>
defined aninstance ofios_base::Init
withstatic storage durationordered initialization (6.9.3.3 [basic.start.dynamic]). Each C++ library module (16.4.2.4 [std.modules]) in a hosted implementation shall behave as if it contains an interface unit that defines an unexportedios_base::Init
variable with ordered initialization(6.9.3.3 [basic.start.dynamic]).