This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of NAD status.
Section: 25.5.1.6 [reverse.iter.elem] Status: NAD Submitter: Hewill Kang Opened: 2022-06-27 Last modified: 2022-11-30
Priority: Not Prioritized
View all other issues in [reverse.iter.elem].
View all issues with NAD status.
Discussion:
For non-pointer types, reverse_iterator::operator-> only requires the expression i.operator->() to be well-formed.
Since the return type of this function is explicitly specified as pointer, this will cause a hard error in the function body when the return type of i.operator->() cannot be converted to pointer. We should add a return type constraint for this.[2022-08-23; Reflector poll: NAD]
pointer
is iterator_traits<Iterator>::pointer
,
which is required to name decltype(i.operator->())
(25.3.2.3 [iterator.traits]/1)
so the postulated problem simply does not arise in valid code.
[2022-11-30 LWG telecon. Status changed: Tentatively NAD → NAD.]
Proposed resolution:
This wording is relative to N4910.
Modify 25.5.1.6 [reverse.iter.elem] as indicated:
constexpr pointer operator->() const requires (is_pointer_v<Iterator> || requires(const Iterator i) { { i.operator->() } -> convertible_to<pointer>; });-2- Effects:
(2.1) — If Iterator is a pointer type, equivalent to: return prev(current);
(2.2) — Otherwise, equivalent to: return prev(current).operator->();