Issue 3096: path::lexically_relative is confused by trailing slashes

This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of C++20 status.

3096. `path::lexically_relative` is confused by trailing slashes

Section: 31.12.6.5.11 [fs.path.gen] Status: C++20 Submitter: Jonathan Wakely Opened: 2018-04-04 Last modified: 2021-02-25

Priority: 2

View all other issues in [fs.path.gen].

View all issues with C++20 status.

Discussion:

filesystem::proximate("/dir", "/dir/") returns "." when "/dir" exists, and ".." otherwise. It should always be "." because whether it exists shouldn't matter.

The problem is in filesystem::path::lexically_relative, as shown by:

path("/dir").lexically_relative("/dir/.");  // yields ""
path("/dir").lexically_relative("/dir/");   // yields ".."

The two calls should yield the same result, and when iteration of a path with a trailing slash gave "." as the final element they did yield the same result. In the final C++17 spec the trailing slash produces an empty filename in the iteration sequence, and lexically_relative doesn't handle that correctly.

[2018-04-10, Jonathan comments]

There are more inconsistencies with paths that are "obviously" equivalent to the human reader:

path("a/b/c").lexically_relative("a/b/c")    // yields "."
path("a/b/c").lexically_relative("a/b/c/")   // yields ".."
path("a/b/c").lexically_relative("a/b/c/.")  // yields ""
path("a/b/c/").lexically_relative("a/b/c")   // yields ""
path("a/b/c/.").lexically_relative("a/b/c")  // yields "."
path("a/b/c/.").lexically_relative("a/b/c/") // yields "../."

I think the right solution is:

when counting [b, base.end()) in bullet (4.2) handle empty filename elements (which can only occur as the last element, due to a trailing slash) equivalently to dot elements; and
add a new condition for the case where n == 0 and [a, end()) contains no non-empty elements, i.e. the paths are equivalent except for final dots or a final slash, which don't introduce any relative difference between the paths.

[2018-06-18 after reflector discussion]

Priority set to 2

[2018-08-23 Batavia Issues processing]

Status to Tentatively Ready

[2018-11, Adopted in San Diego]

Proposed resolution:

This wording is relative to N4727.

Edit 31.12.6.5.11 [fs.path.gen] as indicated:
```
path lexically_relative(const path& base) const;
```
-3- Returns: *this made relative to base. Does not resolve (31.12.6 [fs.class.path]) symlinks. Does not first normalize (31.12.6.2 [fs.path.generic]) *this or base.
-4- Effects: If root_name() != base.root_name() is true or is_absolute() != base.is_absolute() is true or !has_root_directory() && base.has_root_directory() is true, returns path(). Determines the first mismatched element of *this and base as if by:
```
auto [a, b] = mismatch(begin(), end(), base.begin(), base.end());
```
Then,
1. (4.1) — if a == end() and b == base.end(), returns path("."); otherwise
2. (4.2) — let n be the number of filename elements in [b, base.end()) that are not dot or dot-dot or empty, minus the number that are dot-dot. If n<0, returns path(); otherwise
3. (4.?) — if n == 0 and (a == end() || a->empty()), returns path("."); otherwise
4. (4.3) — returns an object of class path that is default-constructed, followed by […]

3096. path::lexically_relative is confused by trailing slashes

3096. `path::lexically_relative` is confused by trailing slashes