This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of Resolved status.
Section: 21.3.7 [meta.rel] Status: Resolved Submitter: Great Britain Opened: 2017-02-03 Last modified: 2020-09-06
Priority: Not Prioritized
View other active issues in [meta.rel].
View all other issues in [meta.rel].
View all issues with Resolved status.
Discussion:
Addresses GB 55It is becoming more and more apparent that using a function type as the template argument to result_of causes annoying problems. That was done because C++03 didn't have variadic templates, so it allowed an arbitrary number of types to be smuggled into the template via a single parameter, but it's a hack and unnecessary in C++ today. result_of<F(Args...)> has absolutely nothing to do with a function type that returns F, and the syntactic trickery using a function type has unfortunate consequences such as top-level cv-qualifiers and arrays decaying (because those are the rules for function types).
It might be too late to change result_of, but we should not repeat the same mistake for std::is_callable.
Proposed change: Possibly get rid of the is_callable<Fn(ArgTypes?...), R> specialization. Change the primary template is_callable<class, class R = void> to is_callable<class Fn, class.. ArgTypes?> and define a separate template such as is_callable_r<class R, class Fn, class... ArgTypes?> for the version that checks the return type. The resulting inconsistency might need to be resolved/improved upon.
[2017-02, pre-Kona]
See also LWG 2927.
[2017-02-22, Daniel comments and provides concrete wording]
The approach chosen to resolve this issue is a merger with LWG 2928, that is the callable traits are also renamed to invocable.
Previous resolution [SUPERSEDED]:
This wording is relative to N4640.
Modify 21.3.3 [meta.type.synop], header <type_traits> synopsis, as indicated:
[…] // 20.15.6, type relations […]template <class, class R = void> struct is_callable; // not defined template <class Fn, class... ArgTypes, class R> struct is_callable<Fn(ArgTypes...), R>;template <class Fn, class... ArgTypes> struct is_invocable; template <class R, class Fn, class... ArgTypes> struct is_invocable_r;template <class, class R = void> struct is_nothrow_callable; // not defined template <class Fn, class... ArgTypes, class R> struct is_nothrow_callable<Fn(ArgTypes...), R>;template <class Fn, class... ArgTypes> struct is_nothrow_invocable; template <class R, class Fn, class... ArgTypes> struct is_nothrow_invocable_r; […] // 20.15.6, type relations […]template <class T, class R = void> constexpr bool is_callable_v = is_callable<T, R>::value; template <class T, class R = void> constexpr bool is_nothrow_callable_v = is_nothrow_callable<T, R>::value;template <class Fn, class... ArgTypes> constexpr bool is_invocable_v = is_invocable<Fn, ArgTypes...>::value; template <class R, class Fn, class... ArgTypes> constexpr bool is_invocable_r_v = is_invocable_r<R, Fn, ArgTypes...>::value; template <class Fn, class... ArgTypes> constexpr bool is_nothrow_invocable_v = is_nothrow_invocable<Fn, ArgTypes...>::value; template <class R, class Fn, class... ArgTypes> constexpr bool is_nothrow_invocable_r_v = is_nothrow_invocable_r<R, Fn, ArgTypes...>::value; […]Modify 21.3.7 [meta.rel], Table 44 — "Type relationship predicates", as indicated:
Table 44 — Type relationship predicates […] template <class Fn, class...
ArgTypes, class R>
struct is_invocablecallable<;
Fn(ArgTypes...), R>The expression
INVOKE(declval<Fn>(),
declval<ArgTypes>()...,) is well formed when treated
R
as an unevaluated operandFn , R,and all types in the
parameter pack ArgTypes shall
be complete types, cv void, or
arrays of unknown bound.template <class R, class Fn, class...
ArgTypes>
struct is_invocable_r;The expression
INVOKE(declval<Fn>(),
declval<ArgTypes>()...,
R) is well formed when treated
as an unevaluated operandFn, R, and all types in the
parameter pack ArgTypes shall
be complete types, cv void, or
arrays of unknown bound.template <class Fn, class...
ArgTypes, class R>
struct is_nothrow_invocablecallable<;
Fn(ArgTypes...), R>is_invocable callable_v<
Fn, ArgTypes...Fn(ArgTypes...), R> is
true and the expression
INVOKE(declval<Fn>(),
declval<ArgTypes>()...,) is known not to throw any
R
exceptionsFn , R,and all types in the
parameter pack ArgTypes shall
be complete types, cv void, or
arrays of unknown bound.template <class R, class Fn, class...
ArgTypes, class R>
struct is_nothrow_invocable_r;is_invocable_r_v<
R, Fn, ArgTypes...> is
true and the expression
INVOKE(declval<Fn>(),
declval<ArgTypes>()...,
R) is known not to throw any
exceptionsFn, R, and all types in the
parameter pack ArgTypes shall
be complete types, cv void, or
arrays of unknown bound.
[2017-02-24, Daniel comments]
I suggest to apply the paper d0604r0 instead, available on the Kona LWG wiki.
[2017-03-12, post-Kona]
Resolved by p0604r0.
Proposed resolution: