This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of Resolved status.
Section: 23.3.6 [string.view.hash] Status: Resolved Submitter: Nicolai Josuttis Opened: 2016-11-09 Last modified: 2016-11-21
Priority: Not Prioritized
View all issues with Resolved status.
Discussion:
Under certain conditions we want to be able to use string_view instead of string. As a consequence both types should behave the same as long we talk about value specific behavior (if possible). For this reason, we should require that both strings and string_view yield the same hash values.
Should be solved in C++17 to ensure that following this use does not require to change hash values (which is allowed but possibly unfortunate).[2016-11-12, Issaquah]
Resolved by P0513R0
Proposed resolution:
This wording is relative to N4606.
A more formal formulation would be:
For any sv of type SV (being string_view, u16string_view, u32string_view, or wstring_view) and s of the corresponding type S (being string, u16string, u32string, or wstring), hash<SV>()(sv) == hash<S>()(s).
Edit 23.3.6 [string.view.hash] as indicated:
template<> struct hash<string_view>; template<> struct hash<u16string_view>; template<> struct hash<u32string_view>; template<> struct hash<wstring_view>>;-1- The template specializations shall meet the requirements of class template hash (22.10.19 [unord.hash]). The hash values shall be the same as the hash values for the corresponding string class (23.4.6 [basic.string.hash]).