This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of Resolved status.
Section: 23.4.3.7.4 [string.insert] Status: Resolved Submitter: Marshall Clow Opened: 2016-07-30 Last modified: 2020-09-06
Priority: 1
View all other issues in [string.insert].
View all issues with Resolved status.
Discussion:
Before C++17, we had the following signature to std::basic_string:
basic_string& insert(size_type pos1, const basic_string& str, size_type pos2, size_type n = npos);
Unlike most of the other member functions on std::basic_string, there were not corresponding versions that take a charT* or (charT *, size).
In p0254r2, we added:basic_string& insert(size_type pos1, basic_string_view<charT, traits> sv, size_type pos2, size_type n = npos);
which made the code above ambiguous. There are two conversions from "const charT*", one to basic_string, and the other to basic_string_view, and they're both equally good (in the view of the compiler).
This ambiguity also occurs with the callsassign(const basic_string& str, size_type pos, size_type n = npos); assign(basic_string_view<charT, traits> sv, size_type pos, size_type n = npos);
but I will file a separate issue (2758) for that.
A solution is to add even more overloads to insert, to make it match all the other member functions of basic_string, which come in fours (string, pointer, pointer + size, string_view).[2016-08-03, Chicago, Robert Douglas provides wording]
Previous resolution [SUPERSEDED]:
This wording is relative to N4606.
In 23.4.3 [basic.string] modify the synopsis for basic_string as follows:
namespace std { template<class charT, class traits = char_traits<charT>, class Allocator = allocator<charT>> class basic_string { public: […] template<class T> basic_string& insert(size_type pos1,basic_string_view<charT, traits>T sv, size_type pos2, size_type n = npos); […] }; }In 23.4.3.7.4 [string.insert], modify basic_string_view overload as follows:
template<class T> basic_string& insert(size_type pos1,basic_string_view<charT, traits>T sv, size_type pos2, size_type n = npos);[…]
-?- Remarks: This function shall not participate in overload resolution unless is_same_v<T, basic_string_view<charT, traits>> is true.
[2016-08-04, Chicago, Robert Douglas comments]
For the sake of simplicity, the previous wording suggestion has been merged into the proposed wording of LWG 2758.
[08-2016, Chicago]
Fri PM: Move to Tentatively Ready (along with 2758).
[2016-09-09 Issues Resolution Telecon]
Since 2758 has been moved back to Open, move this one, too
[2016-10 Telecon]
Ville's wording for 2758 has been implemented in libstdc++ and libc++. Move 2758 to Tentatively Ready and this one to Tentatively Resolved
Proposed resolution:
This issue is resolved by the proposed wording for LWG 2758.