This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of C++17 status.
Section: 99 [depr.storage.iterator] Status: C++17 Submitter: Jonathan Wakely Opened: 2014-11-11 Last modified: 2017-07-30
Priority: 0
View all other issues in [depr.storage.iterator].
View all issues with C++17 status.
Discussion:
Eric Niebler pointed out that raw_storage_iterator should give access to the OutputIterator it wraps.
This helps alleviate the exception-safety issue pointed out in the discussion of LWG 2127, as an exception can be caught and then destructors can be run for the constructed elements in the range [begin, raw.base())[2015-02 Cologne]
NJ: Is this "const" correct [in "base()"]? DK: Yes, we always do that. NJ: And the output iterator is not qualifying in any way? AM/DK: That wouldn't make sense. NJ: OK.
VV: What did LEWG say about this feature request? In other words, why is this a library issue? AM: LEWG/JY thought this wouldn't be a contentious issue. NJ: I really hope the split of LEWG and LWG will be fixed soon, since it's only wasting time. VV: So you want to spend even more of your time on discussions that LEWG has? AM: I think this specified correctly. I'm not wild about it. But no longer bothered to stand in its way. GR: Why do we need to repeat the type in "Returns" even though it's part of the synopsis? AM: Good point, but not worth fixing. NJ: Why is "base()" for reverse_iterator commented with "// explicit"? AM: I guess in 1998 that was the only way to say this. AM: So, it's tentatively ready.Proposed resolution:
This wording is relative to N4140.
Add a new function to the synopsis in [storage.iterator] p1:
namespace std { template <class OutputIterator, class T> class raw_storage_iterator : public iterator<output_iterator_tag,void,void,void,void> { public: explicit raw_storage_iterator(OutputIterator x); raw_storage_iterator<OutputIterator,T>& operator*(); raw_storage_iterator<OutputIterator,T>& operator=(const T& element); raw_storage_iterator<OutputIterator,T>& operator++(); raw_storage_iterator<OutputIterator,T> operator++(int); OutputIterator base() const; }; }
Insert the new function and a new paragraph series after p7:
OutputIterator base() const;-?- Returns: An iterator of type OutputIterator that points to the same value as *this points to.