This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the Library Active Issues List for more information and the meaning of Resolved status.
Section: 25.5.1 [reverse.iterators] Status: Resolved Submitter: Jeffrey Yasskin Opened: 2012-10-30 Last modified: 2017-03-12
Priority: 3
View all other issues in [reverse.iterators].
View all issues with Resolved status.
Discussion:
std::reverse_iterator::reverse_iterator(Iterator) should be constexpr so that other constexpr functions can return reverse_iterators. Of the other methods, the other constructors, base(), operator+, operator-, operator[], and the non-member operators can probably also be constexpr.
operator* cannot be constexpr because it involves an assignment to a member variable. Discussion starting with c++std-lib-33282 indicated that it would be useful to make reverse_iterator a literal type despite this restriction on its use at compile time.Proposed resolution:
This issue was Resolved by paper P0031R0 adopted at Jacksonville, 2016.