From owner-sc35wg4+sc35wg4-domo=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Wed Mar 7 02:46:08 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc35wg4-domo Delivered-To: sc35wg4-domo@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id BF032356941; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 02:46:08 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: sc35wg4@open-std.org Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F52C356941; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 02:46:07 +0100 (CET) Received: by wgbfm10 with SMTP id fm10so3376741wgb.22 for ; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 17:46:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/CPgEBbiqJOR5alM0Xu045D/3bbqQiaSG740SN6W9uw=; b=czM1GN/ObLK/wUkPj34oLwgjJ0JKxv2C8FAoyXEBOfp87zc4KHWYGu7al5K4YbFU6h 8ndFosZ3JQu8lDQ8w8rYjF8EhTYhCKi6S7NddfhaWXMEjo4HHfjao8q4cVpg+u+z1WA5 p4zvHm/hGK2MIB7psUZg4b/Dlc143I42j2loG7oXBc77NrZbVQJnwPCffLLBhOHIzcVY qLbjGmgS2QoflxcxmUf+7YSg+mFqFZLIIoixIQD3Lqy8DdR49ldtm5/BnEYA93WdSJLE lSC2wfcgV+tafj0YVZ7F8KbmAUIQNG8wOvTQb254iR9ZqbSmCNq142lpKBgdRaGB9xe1 bYZg== Received: by 10.180.100.228 with SMTP id fb4mr414973wib.1.1331084767194; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 17:46:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from andysmacbook.localdomain (axelrod.plus.com. [81.174.245.58]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k6sm32312630wiy.7.2012.03.06.17.46.04 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 06 Mar 2012 17:46:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F56BDDB.1060706@axelrod.plus.com> Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 01:46:03 +0000 From: Andy Heath User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alain_LaBont=E9?= CC: sc35wg4@open-std.org, jaeil@nia.or.kr, sc35wg1@open-std.org Subject: Re: (SC35WG1.326) (SC35WG4.10) Reviced WD 17549 (4-direction devices) References: <20120229034257.97BBD9DB114@www.open-std.org> <20120306155520.76861356945@www.open-std.org> <20120306220605.23A7F356941@www.open-std.org> In-Reply-To: <20120306220605.23A7F356941@www.open-std.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sc35wg4@open-std.org Precedence: bulk Alain et. al., > [Alain] We could also say (better understanding of what it is ?) : > > 4. Methods for navigation and selection within menus with > 4-direction devices. > > I think the relationship between words would not totally be clear for me > unless we simplify. > > Is it really useful to say "guidelines on [...] methods"? The word > "methods" by itself is simple enough and is already stronger and more > meaningful than guidelines on methods. I prefer your suggestion Alain (number 4) to the three suggestions I made - it is simpler and cleaner. andy > > Alain > > Alain Cheers andy -- __________________ Andy Heath http://axelafa.com