From JLS@liverpool.ac.uk Thu Mar 12 11:07:30 1992
Received: from danpost2.uni-c.dk by dkuug.dk via EUnet with SMTP (5.64+/8+bit/IDA-1.2.8)
	id AA18343; Thu, 12 Mar 92 11:07:30 +0100
Received: from vm.uni-c.dk by danpost2.uni-c.dk (5.65/1.34)
	id AA08651; Thu, 12 Mar 92 10:06:20 GMT
Message-Id: <9203121006.AA08651@danpost2.uni-c.dk>
Received: from vm.uni-c.dk by vm.uni-c.dk (IBM VM SMTP V2R1) with BSMTP id 4893;
   Thu, 12 Mar 92 11:07:47 DNT
Received: from UKACRL.BITNET by vm.uni-c.dk (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 2358;
 Thu, 12 Mar 92 11:07:44 DNT
Received: from RL.IB by UKACRL.BITNET (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 9778; Thu,
 12 Mar 92 10:03:16 GMT
Received: 
           from RL.IB by UK.AC.RL.IB (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 4167; Thu, 12
             Mar 92 10:01:21 GMT
Via:         UK.AC.LIV.IBM; 12 MAR 92  9:58:30 GMT
Received:    from JLS@UK.AC.LIVERPOOL
             by MAILER(4.2.a);  12 Mar 1992 09:56:57 GM
Date:        Thu, 12 Mar 92 09:48:26 GMT
From: Lawrie Schonfelder <JLS@liverpool.ac.uk>
Subject:     Re: (SC22WG5.49) Re: retransmission of string module
To: alm@beta.lanl.gov, SC22/WG5 members <SC22WG5@dkuug.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of Wed, 11 Mar 92 08:45:16 -0700
X-Charset: ASCII
X-Char-Esc: 29

Alex was confused by my set of messages of the past few days so I will
try to explain. Sorry if I was not as clear as I had hoped.


The first set of emails which contained an incorrect version of the
module along with the ascii version of the text of the standard was split
into 5 messages each about 1000 records (probably greater due to header type
bumpf) these had subject IS1539_1 (a,b,c,d,e). c apparantly got stuck in
one of the gateways. Yesterday I sent a correct version of the module only
in 4 messages subject "string module A,B,C,D".

As the missing IS1539_1c was all module and incorrect I do not intend re
sending it. The whole of the module text in this set of email needs to
be replaced by that in the second set of ABCD messages.


Lawrie
