From Mok-Kong.Shen@lrz.lrz-muenchen.d400.de Fri Oct 22 16:00:06 1993 Received: from cd1.lrz-muenchen.de by dkuug.dk with SMTP id AA10485 (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4j for ); Fri, 22 Oct 1993 16:00:06 +0100 Received: by cd1.lrz-muenchen.de; Fri, 22 Oct 93 16:01:00 +0100 X400-Trace: de*d400*lrz-muenchen; arrival 22 Oct 93 14:00:24 Z action Relayed X400-Internal-Trace: MTALRZCD1; arrival 22 Oct 93 16:00:59 +0100 action Relayed X400-Internal-Trace: MTALRZVEE; arrival 22 Oct 93 14:00:26 Z action Relayed P1-Message-Id: de*d400*lrz-muenchen; 931022155829840-MTALRZVEE Ua-Content-Id: 931022155829840- Original-Encoded-Information-Types: IA5-Text Message-Id: <931022155829840-MTALRZVEE*Mok-Kong.Shen@lrz.lrz-muenchen.d400.de> Date: 22 Oct 93 14:00:24 Z From: Mok-Kong.Shen@lrz-muenchen.de To: SC22WG5@dkuug.dk Subject: RE: Progressive vs. Conservative X-Charset: ASCII X-Char-Esc: 29 Mr. Cohen wrote: > Er, we always want to improve the speed and effectiveness of our procedures, > being progressive has nothing to do with it. Indeed, over the next couple of > years we are going to find out whether our new way of working *has* increased > the speed etc. Being conservative means one doesn't want to change much, consequently there is no need (no point) to improve the speed and effectiveness or our procedures. 'Our new way of working' is something I don't yet comprehend. What is essentially new compared to, say, 10 years ago? M. K. Shen