From JLS@liverpool.ac.uk Wed Mar 11 11:34:21 1992 Received: from danpost2.uni-c.dk by dkuug.dk via EUnet with SMTP (5.64+/8+bit/IDA-1.2.8) id AA09423; Wed, 11 Mar 92 11:34:21 +0100 Received: from vm.uni-c.dk by danpost2.uni-c.dk (5.65/1.34) id AA20387; Wed, 11 Mar 92 10:33:12 GMT Message-Id: <9203111033.AA20387@danpost2.uni-c.dk> Received: from vm.uni-c.dk by vm.uni-c.dk (IBM VM SMTP V2R1) with BSMTP id 3390; Wed, 11 Mar 92 11:34:19 DNT Received: from UKACRL.BITNET by vm.uni-c.dk (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 6477; Wed, 11 Mar 92 11:34:18 DNT Received: from RL.IB by UKACRL.BITNET (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 4583; Wed, 11 Mar 92 10:33:19 GMT Received: from RL.IB by UK.AC.RL.IB (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 0835; Wed, 11 Mar 92 10:33:18 GMT Via: UK.AC.LIV.IBM; 11 MAR 92 10:33:10 GMT Received: from JLS@UK.AC.LIVERPOOL by MAILER(4.2.a); 11 Mar 1992 10:32:12 GM Date: Wed, 11 Mar 92 10:20:51 GMT From: Lawrie Schonfelder Subject: string module To: SC22/WG5 members X-Charset: ASCII X-Char-Esc: 29 Apologies: I have inadvertently incorporated the wrong version of the module in the text. I had produced a version with explicit DEALLOCATES in various places as an experiment. This failed as it was bound to since by definition pointers are created undefined but I wanted to see what would happen!!! I had not erased this experimental version and my WP software incorporated this by mistake. Sorry! I will retransmit the correct version in following e-mails and will send Jeanne a corrected version on paper. Never trust technology check it! Regards Lawrie