From J.Reid@letterbox.rl.ac.uk Tue Jun 29 14:30:27 1993 Received: from danpost4.uni-c.dk by dkuug.dk with SMTP id AA03017 (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4j for ); Tue, 29 Jun 1993 11:24:35 +0200 X400-Received: by mta danpost4.uni-c.dk in /PRMD=minerva/ADMD=dk400/C=dk/; Relayed; Tue, 29 Jun 1993 11:23:34 +0200 X400-Received: by /PRMD=uk.ac/ADMD= /C=gb/; Relayed; Tue, 29 Jun 1993 11:24:24 +0200 X400-Received: by /PRMD=UK.AC/ADMD= /C=GB/; Relayed; Tue, 29 Jun 1993 11:24:55 +0200 X400-Received: by /PRMD=UK.AC/ADMD= /C=GB/; Relayed; Tue, 29 Jun 1993 12:30:27 +0200 X400-Received: by /PRMD=UK.AC/ADMD= /C=GB/; Relayed; Tue, 29 Jun 1993 12:30:27 +0200 Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1993 12:30:27 +0200 X400-Originator: J.Reid@letterbox.rutherford.ac.uk X400-Recipients: SC22WG5@dkuug.dk X400-Mts-Identifier: [/PRMD=UK.AC/ADMD= /C=GB/;<9306291030.AA09639@numerical.cc] X400-Content-Type: P2-1984 (2) Content-Identifier: X3J3/93-007 From: " (John Reid)" Sender: J.Reid@letterbox.rl.ac.uk Message-Id: <9306291030.AA09639@numerical.cc.rl.ac.uk> To: SC22WG5@dkuug.dk Subject: X3J3/93-007 X-Charset: ASCII X-Char-Esc: 29 I have checked X3J3/93-007 against the WG5 draft Technical Corrigendum N903 that we will have before us next week. I find that is has many more edits than are in N903 and that several of the edits are inconsistent. I believe that N903 is right and 007 is wrong except in one case: 182, first line of the new text, add comma after 'procedure'. The other inconsistencies are for 42, 78, 93:34, 123, 170, 178, 182:12, 220, 247. They vary from being pretty serious to trivial. Can we ignore 007 next week, please? John Reid.