From J.Reid@directory.rl.ac.uk Mon May 10 18:06:12 1993
Received: from ns.dknet.dk by dkuug.dk with SMTP id AA27045
  (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4j for <SC22WG5@dkuug.dk>); Mon, 10 May 1993 15:06:56 +0200
Received: from danpost4.uni-c.dk by ns.dknet.dk with SMTP id AA23597
  (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4j for <SC22WG5@dkuug.dk>); Mon, 10 May 1993 15:07:21 +0200
X400-Received: by mta danpost4.uni-c.dk in /PRMD=minerva/ADMD=dk400/C=dk/;
               Relayed; Mon, 10 May 1993 15:04:32 +0200
X400-Received: by /PRMD=uk.ac/ADMD= /C=gb/; Relayed;
               Mon, 10 May 1993 15:04:42 +0200
X400-Received: by /PRMD=UK.AC/ADMD= /C=GB/; Relayed;
               Mon, 10 May 1993 15:04:39 +0200
X400-Received: by /PRMD=UK.AC/ADMD= /C=GB/; Relayed;
               Mon, 10 May 1993 16:06:12 +0200
X400-Received: by /PRMD=UK.AC/ADMD= /C=GB/; Relayed;
               Mon, 10 May 1993 16:06:12 +0200
Date: Mon, 10 May 1993 16:06:12 +0200
X400-Originator: J.Reid@directory.rutherford.ac.uk
X400-Recipients: SC22WG5@dkuug.dk
X400-Mts-Identifier: [/PRMD=UK.AC/ADMD= /C=GB/;<9305101406.AA01006@numerical.cc]
X400-Content-Type: P2-1984 (2)
Content-Identifier: Message for X...
From: " (John Reid)" <jkr@directory.rl.ac.uk>
Sender: J.Reid@directory.rl.ac.uk
Message-Id: <9305101406.AA01006@numerical.cc.rl.ac.uk>
To: hirchert@ncsa.uiuc.edu
Cc: SC22WG5@dkuug.dk
Subject: Message for X3J3 re ISO technical corrigendum
X-Charset: ASCII
X-Char-Esc: 29

Mike being away in Africa, I have been conducting a fax correspondence with
Keith Brannon of ISO. I am faxing his latest fax to you. I had sent him a
copy of s20.74 as a specimen. He sends me an example of a published 
Technical Corrigendum and says
    You will note that it provides only the basic information and none
    of the commentary present in your example (this kind of information
    is deleted after the defect is confirmed as a Technical
    Corrigendum, this would not preclude however the committee
    responsible for the standard from maintaining a list of the defect
    reports with all the items you mention).

If I modify s20.74 according to his specimen, I get:


   Page 158

   Subclause 11.3.2

   Line 28, change the term "no entity is referenced by this name" to "the
   name is not used to refer to an entity".


I see this as just fine, except that I would prefer to omit the word
'Subclause'. In addition, I suggest that the subset of s20 that is
fully approved by wg5 be made available on a ftp server and/or be
published in Fortran Forum, and be referenced it in the Technical
Corrigendum.


Have a good week. 

John.