From jwagener@amoco.com Mon Apr 5 04:46:01 1993 Received: from interlock.amoco.com by dkuug.dk with SMTP id AA06113 (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4j for ); Mon, 5 Apr 1993 16:45:50 +0200 Received: by interlock.amoco.com id AA12411 (InterLock SMTP Gateway 1.1 for SC22WG5@dkuug.dk); Mon, 5 Apr 1993 09:39:22 -0500 Received: by interlock.amoco.com (Internal Mail Agent-2); Mon, 5 Apr 1993 09:39:22 -0500 Received: by interlock.amoco.com (Internal Mail Agent-1); Mon, 5 Apr 1993 09:39:22 -0500 Date: Mon, 5 Apr 93 09:46:01 CDT Message-Id: <9304051446.AA02773@trc.amoco.com> From: Jerrold L. Wagener To: SC22WG5@dkuug.dk Cc: jwagener@amoco.com Subject: ballot results and May X3J3 meeting matters X-Charset: ASCII X-Char-Esc: 29 To X3J3 - I have now analyzed the comments that accompanied the last letter ballot on 006 items; the corresponding recommendations (subject to committee approval, of course) will be in the premeeting, along with the comments. Briefly, those recommendations are: accept as-is and reclassify as "ready for WG5": 0-b, 41, 75, 92, 93, 112, 113, 117, 123, 130 accept with minor edits, as per comments, and reclassify as "ready for WG5": 4, 11, 12, 29, 30, 39, 58, 71, 73, 79, 86, 89, 105, 108, 129 return to subgroups for review (and my recommendation says why): 27 (DATA), 70 (PROC), 82 (PROC), 87 (DATA), 91 (DATA), 97 (GEN), 100 (DATA), 125 (DATA) With these 8 reconsideration items, there are a total of 27 items currently in the 006 that are not yet ready for WG5. They are: /edit GEN DATA PROC ----- --- ---- ---- 7 96 27 49 28 97 76 70 88 101 77 82 121 81 83 87 90 91 99 100 122 111 124 125 126 127 128 I would like to reassign the three /edit items (7, 28, 88) to GEN for the May meeting, so that /edit can spend full time on editorial issues reagrding the document for the next revision. GEN and /edit, is this alright with you? Naturally there will be a few new requests to be assigned, but so far I have seen only a couple such. Finally, since X3H5 will be meeting with /parallel during the May meeting on the X3H5 Fortran 90 binding, I would like to ask CIO to spend this meeting on helping that activity get completed. I have just distributed the postscript file for the draft binding (it seemed to get back to me OK through the WG5 reflector); it would be desirable if the /parallel and CIO members became familiar with this draft before the meeting, so that the meeting can focus on solving problems rather than getting up to speed (of course it would be even more desirable if all members were familiar with the draft). Maybe Kurt can put that file on the X3J3 server so that anyone that has trouble with it via the email message can get it via FTP from the server. More later. Jerry