From adt10@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com Tue Mar 23 06:29:00 1993 Received: from amdahl.com by dkuug.dk with SMTP id AA01571 (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4j for ); Tue, 23 Mar 1993 23:30:06 +0100 Received: by amdahl.com (/\==/\ Smail #25.32) id ; Tue, 23 Mar 93 14:30 PST Received: by amdahl.uts.amdahl.com (/\../\ Smail3.1.14.4 #14.12) id ; Tue, 23 Mar 93 14:29 PST Message-Id: Date: Tue, 23 Mar 93 14:29 PST From: adt10@uts.amdahl.com (Andrew D. Tait) To: sc22wg5@dkuug.dk Subject: Defect Management Document X-Charset: ASCII X-Char-Esc: 29 An informal poll. Several of the entries in the current interpretations document contain page and line number references in the form [p:l] or [p:l-l]. Those of us who have put a lot of effort into this document find the line numbers particularly useful. However, line numbers are not part of the English (or any other version) of the standard. All text that is referenced in interpretations should be identified by section number and, wherever possible, with the text itself quoted (if the section number is not provided, the editor will supply it). Does anyone believe that SC22 would reject our defect management document if it reaches them with the page and line numbers included? I would appreciate a prompt reply as I want to resolve this issue as soon as possible (and I would rather not have to strip the line numbers out just for the version that goes to SC22). Andrew D. Tait **************************************************************************