From SUPERVISOR@edvzbb1.edvz.tuwien.ac.at Wed Feb 3 12:32:31 1993 Received: from email.tuwien.ac.at by dkuug.dk with SMTP id AA00108 (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4j for ); Wed, 3 Feb 1993 12:32:31 +0100 Received: from bbmail.edvz.tuwien.ac.at by email.tuwien.ac.at (5.65b/1.34-MHS) id AA20588; Wed, 3 Feb 93 12:32:37 +0100 Received: From EDVZ_BB1/WORKQUEUE by bbmail.edvz.tuwien.ac.at via Charon-4.0-VROOM with IPX id 100.930203123227.352; 03 Feb 93 12:32:39 -100 Message-Id: To: SC22WG5@dkuug.dk From: "Gerhard Schmitt" Date: 3 Feb 93 12:32:16 CET-60 Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.307) and (SC22.268) Reply-To: Schmitt@email.tuwien.ac.at X-Pmrqc: 1 X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail v2.3 (R2). X-Charset: ASCII X-Char-Esc: 29 Dear collegues, 1. It looks like that the heades of some messages become corrupted by an extra emty line: > Date: Tue, 2 Feb 1993 14:41:45 +0100 > From: SC22WG5-request@dkuug.dk > Wed, 3 Feb 93 10:36:26 GMT > From: jls@uxb.liv.ac.uk (Dr.J.L.Schonfelder) > X-Sequence: SC22WG5@dkuug.dk 307 > Errors-To: SC22WG5-request@dkuug.dk > Message-Id: <8055.9302021441@uxb.liv.ac.uk > > Subject: (SC22WG5.307) Re: (SC22.268) Ballot on N1267, CD 1539:1991 Amendment 1 > To: FOLLETT@betvmic1.vnet.ibm.com (Follett RH) > Date: Tue, 2 Feb 93 14:41:45 GMT > Cc: SC22WG5@dkuug.dk (SC22/WG5 members) > In-Reply-To: <199301282300.AA22752@dkuug.dk>; from "Follett RH" at Jan 28, 93 5:28 pm > X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11] > X-Charset: ASCII > X-Char-Esc: 29 > ... some text deleted. > The nearest precedent I would suggest is the elementary functions standard > that is additional to Ada. How was that handled? As an amendment, an addendum, > a separate standard, or an additional part? 2. There is also a precedent with FORTRAN 77. ISO 7846:1985 Industrial real-time FORTRAN - Applications for the control of industrial processes. Kind regards, Gerhard