From owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk  Fri Oct 10 18:20:24 2003
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
	by dkuug.dk (8.12.10/8.9.2) id h9AGKOSD048199
	for sc22wg5-domo; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 18:20:24 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk)
X-Authentication-Warning: ptah.dkuug.dk: majordom set sender to owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk using -f
Received: from mx1.liv.ac.uk (mx1.liv.ac.uk [138.253.100.179])
	by dkuug.dk (8.12.10/8.9.2) with ESMTP id h9AGKHEt048194
	for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 18:20:19 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from j.l.schonfelder@liverpool.ac.uk)
Received: from mailhub5.liv.ac.uk ([138.253.100.157])
	by mx1.liv.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24)
	id 1A800G-0001ZR-Jz
	for sc22wg5@dkuug.dk; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 17:20:32 +0100
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mailhub5.liv.ac.uk)
	by mailhub5.liv.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.22)
	id 1A800G-0005OG-IL
	for sc22wg5@dkuug.dk; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 17:20:32 +0100
Received: from vp135022.liv.ac.uk ([138.253.135.22] helo=jls-rm-home.liv.ac.uk)
	by mailhub5.liv.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1A800G-0005OD-EQ
	for sc22wg5@dkuug.dk; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 17:20:32 +0100
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 17:20:24 +0100
From: "J.L.Schonfelder" <j.l.schonfelder@liverpool.ac.uk>
To: WG5 <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>
Subject: INLINING
Message-ID: <11299027.1065806424@jls-rm-home.liv.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <200310091535.h99FZmdE019913@dkuug.dk>
References:  <200310091535.h99FZmdE019913@dkuug.dk>
Originator-Info: login-id=jls; server=pop1.liv.ac.uk
X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.2.1 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Scanner: exiscan for exim4 (http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/) *1A800G-0005OD-EQ*1cv3g0WPt16*
X-Spam-Score: 0 () 
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk
Precedence: bulk

An instruction to INLINE appears to me on a par with an instruction to 
optimise, say, by removing constant loop independent expressions. It is not 
a language issue. The language may be phrased so that all the information 
required for the processor to determine that it would be safe to inline but 
is then a quality of implementation issue whether inlining is performed.

--
Lawrie Schonfelder
Honorary Senior Fellow
University of Liverpool
1 Marine Park, West Kirby,
Wirral, UK, CH48 5HN
Phone: +44 (151) 625 6986 
