From owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk Thu Sep 25 13:56:40 2003 Received: from ptah.dkuug.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dkuug.dk (8.12.10/8.9.2) with ESMTP id h8PBud9I055655 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 13:56:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk) Received: (from majordom@localhost) by ptah.dkuug.dk (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id h8PBudnE055654 for sc22wg5-domo; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 13:56:39 +0200 (CEST) X-Authentication-Warning: ptah.dkuug.dk: majordom set sender to owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk using -f Received: from inf.rl.ac.uk (nfs7.inf.rl.ac.uk [130.246.72.7]) by dkuug.dk (8.12.10/8.9.2) with ESMTP id h8PBua9I055649 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 13:56:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk) Received: from numerical.cc.rl.ac.uk (numerical [130.246.8.23]) by inf.rl.ac.uk (8.11.6+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id h8PBuro15032 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 12:56:54 +0100 (BST) Received: from rl.ac.uk (jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk [130.246.9.202]) by numerical.cc.rl.ac.uk (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA13424 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 13:05:55 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <3F72DB33.9090001@rl.ac.uk> Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 13:10:27 +0100 From: John Reid Reply-To: j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk Organization: Rutherford Appleton Laboratory User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: WG5 Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.3010) Informal letter ballot on the draft FCD References: <200309241612.h8OGChvB046730@ptah.dkuug.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk Precedence: bulk Richard Maine wrote: > In reviewing my notes on things to be fixed for the FCD, I see > that although a couple of people noticed the section numbering bug in > Annex D (there are two D.1 sections instead of a D.1 and D.2) and > mentioned in in email, nobody seems to have actually mentioned this > in their vote, at least that I can find. Perhaps I have overlooked > it or perhaps it is in a vote yet to be submitted. > > I suppose I could revise my vote to mention it so that I have an > excuse to fix it (already know exactly how, and it isn't something > that ought to have any controversy), but really, I'm not a collection > point for everyone's votes. Better to send in your own vote than to > send it to me for me to vote on your behalf. That is particularly so > as I already submitted mine, so it adds extra confusion for me to > submit a revised one. I have no problem over receiving additional comments from someone who has already voted. Since I was one of those that privately told Richard about this, I will vote again. Please add this addditional comment to my vote: 544. The section that starts on page 544 should be labelled 'D.2'. John.