From owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk  Wed Sep 24 18:12:42 2003
Received: from ptah.dkuug.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dkuug.dk (8.12.10/8.9.2) with ESMTP id h8OGCg9I046720
	for <sc22wg5-domo@ptah.dkuug.dk>; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 18:12:42 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk)
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
	by ptah.dkuug.dk (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id h8OGCgCN046719
	for sc22wg5-domo; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 18:12:42 +0200 (CEST)
X-Authentication-Warning: ptah.dkuug.dk: majordom set sender to owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk using -f
Received: from mailhub.dfrc.nasa.gov (mailhub.dfrc.nasa.gov [130.134.81.12])
	by dkuug.dk (8.12.10/8.9.2) with ESMTP id h8OGCd9I046711
	for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 18:12:40 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from maine@altair.dfrc.nasa.gov)
Received: from mail.dfrc.nasa.gov by mailhub.dfrc.nasa.gov with ESMTP for sc22wg5@dkuug.dk; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:09:27 -0700
Received: from altair.dfrc.nasa.gov ([130.134.20.211])
          by mail.dfrc.nasa.gov (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223
          ID# 0-71686U2500L200S0V35) with ESMTP id gov
          for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:12:44 -0700
Received: by altair.dfrc.nasa.gov (Postfix, from userid 201)
	id 6B9CB357E9; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:12:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: Richard Maine <Richard.Maine@nasa.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <16241.49784.289544.792577@altair.dfrc.nasa.gov>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:12:40 -0700
To: WG5 <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>
Subject: Informal letter ballot on the draft FCD
X-Mailer: VM 7.07 under 21.4 (patch 12) "Portable Code" XEmacs Lucid
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk
Precedence: bulk

In reviewing my notes on things to be fixed for the FCD, I see
that although a couple of people noticed the section numbering bug in
Annex D (there are two D.1 sections instead of a D.1 and D.2) and
mentioned in in email, nobody seems to have actually mentioned this
in their vote, at least that I can find.  Perhaps I have overlooked
it or perhaps it is in a vote yet to be submitted.

I suppose I could revise my vote to mention it so that I have an
excuse to fix it (already know exactly how, and it isn't something
that ought to have any controversy), but really, I'm not a collection
point for everyone's votes.  Better to send in your own vote than to
send it to me for me to vote on your behalf.  That is particularly so
as I already submitted mine, so it adds extra confusion for me to
submit a revised one.

-- 
Richard Maine                |  Good judgment comes from experience;
Richard.Maine@nasa.gov       |  experience comes from bad judgment.
                             |        -- Mark Twain
