From owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk Mon Sep 22 19:47:57 2003 Received: from ptah.dkuug.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dkuug.dk (8.12.10/8.9.2) with ESMTP id h8MHlrDP031039 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 19:47:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk) Received: (from majordom@localhost) by ptah.dkuug.dk (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id h8MHlrAF031038 for sc22wg5-domo; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 19:47:53 +0200 (CEST) X-Authentication-Warning: ptah.dkuug.dk: majordom set sender to owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk using -f Received: from inf.rl.ac.uk (nfs7.inf.rl.ac.uk [130.246.72.7]) by dkuug.dk (8.12.10/8.9.2) with ESMTP id h8MHllDP031033 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 19:47:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk) Received: from numerical.cc.rl.ac.uk (numerical [130.246.8.23]) by inf.rl.ac.uk (8.11.6+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id h8MHm2o09069 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 18:48:03 +0100 (BST) Received: from rl.ac.uk (jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk [130.246.9.202]) by numerical.cc.rl.ac.uk (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA12971 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 18:57:03 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <3F6F38F0.7070005@rl.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 19:01:20 +0100 From: John Reid Reply-To: j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk Organization: Rutherford Appleton Laboratory User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: WG5 Subject: Informal report from SC22 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk Precedence: bulk Dear WG5, The SC22 meeting went smoothly as far as WG5 is concerned. My report (N1538) was accepted without discussion. Two actions were taken at my request, both arising from SC22 papers sent out after the Dresden meeting: 1. Part 3 (Coco) comes up for its 5-year systematic review in February. I asked for it to be confirmed, saying that it will need to modified for Fortran 2003 or withdrawn, but I do not want us to spend time on this just now. SC22 accepted this argument and confirmed it. 2. I realized that I was editor for part 2 (strings), which must be a relic from the time that Lawrie was ill. I asked to be replaced by Lawrie and this was accepted. This part, too, will need to modified for Fortran 2003 or withdrawn, but again I do not want us to spend time on it just now. Its systematic review comes up in 2005. Problems in other groups has made me realize that I need to be stricter about WG5 participants being authorized by their national bodies. In future, expect me to chase those of you that do not get such authorization. Sorry about that! Best wishes, John.