From owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk Sat Sep 13 11:18:27 2003 Received: (from majordom@localhost) by dkuug.dk (8.12.8p1/8.9.2) id h8D9IRYt042195 for sc22wg5-domo; Sat, 13 Sep 2003 11:18:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk) X-Authentication-Warning: ptah.dkuug.dk: majordom set sender to owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk using -f Received: from mx2.liv.ac.uk (mx2.liv.ac.uk [138.253.100.180]) by dkuug.dk (8.12.8p1/8.9.2) with ESMTP id h8D9IJCp042189 for ; Sat, 13 Sep 2003 11:18:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from j.l.schonfelder@liverpool.ac.uk) Received: from mailhub3.liv.ac.uk ([138.253.100.83]) by mx2.liv.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 19y6Xt-0002Cq-B0 for sc22wg5@dkuug.dk; Sat, 13 Sep 2003 10:18:21 +0100 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=mailhub3.liv.ac.uk) by mailhub3.liv.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 19y6Xt-0007uD-8Q for sc22wg5@dkuug.dk; Sat, 13 Sep 2003 10:18:21 +0100 Received: from vp135020.liv.ac.uk ([138.253.135.20] helo=jls-rm-home.liv.ac.uk) by mailhub3.liv.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 19y6Xt-0007uA-3k for sc22wg5@dkuug.dk; Sat, 13 Sep 2003 10:18:21 +0100 Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 10:18:20 +0100 From: "J.L.Schonfelder" To: WG5 Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.2996) New papers Message-ID: <1993176.1063448300@jls-rm-home.liv.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <200309121417.h8CEHeFH033831@dkuug.dk> References: <200309121417.h8CEHeFH033831@dkuug.dk> Originator-Info: login-id=jls; server=pop1.liv.ac.uk X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.2.1 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Scanner: exiscan for exim4 (http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/) *19y6Xt-0002Cq-B0*JeBgr/uW1/w* Sender: owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk Precedence: bulk As a quick responce I do not see the justification for the changes in N1576. They all seem to make the proposal more complicated, more tricky for the user without adding useful functionality. I will spend some time looking more carefully at the implications but my initial reaction is to oppose these changes. --On 12 September 2003 15:30 +0100 John Reid wrote: > I have placed these new papers on the server: > > 1573 Draft FCD of the new Standard (Maine) > 1574 Changes to TR 19767 implemented at J3 meeting 165 (Snyder) > 1576 Changes proposed to TR 19767 at J3 meeting 165 (Snyder) > > For your convenience, they are attached. > > I would like to draw your attention to N1576, where Van is suggesting a > small change to the technical content of the modules TR that goes beyond > what we decided in Dresden: > > D7. TR on Enhanced Module Facilities in Fortran > That WG5 proposes that the technical content of the draft TR which is > to be submitted to SC22 for PDTR balloting shall be as described in > WG5-N1555, as perhaps modified by N1572. > > Van and I would appreciate comments on this suggested change. > > John. -- Lawrie Schonfelder Honorary Senior Fellow University of Liverpool 1 Marine Park, West Kirby, Wirral, UK, CH48 5HN Phone: +44 (151) 625 6986