From owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk Tue Sep 9 20:03:32 2003 Received: (from majordom@localhost) by dkuug.dk (8.12.8p1/8.9.2) id h89I3WsD004806 for sc22wg5-domo; Tue, 9 Sep 2003 20:03:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk) X-Authentication-Warning: ptah.dkuug.dk: majordom set sender to owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk using -f Received: from mailhub.dfrc.nasa.gov (mailhub.dfrc.nasa.gov [130.134.81.12]) by dkuug.dk (8.12.8p1/8.9.2) with ESMTP id h89I24Cp004779 for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2003 20:03:28 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from maine@altair.dfrc.nasa.gov) Received: from mail.dfrc.nasa.gov by mailhub.dfrc.nasa.gov with ESMTP for sc22wg5@dkuug.dk; Tue, 9 Sep 2003 10:57:44 -0700 Received: from altair.dfrc.nasa.gov ([130.134.20.211]) by mail.dfrc.nasa.gov (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71686U2500L200S0V35) with ESMTP id gov for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2003 11:00:53 -0700 Received: by altair.dfrc.nasa.gov (Postfix, from userid 201) id C465335769; Tue, 9 Sep 2003 11:00:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Richard Maine MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <16222.5457.699249.723894@altair.dfrc.nasa.gov> Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 11:00:49 -0700 To: sc22wg5@dkuug.dk Subject: (SC22WG5.2988) More typos In-Reply-To: <200309091733.h89HXdaQ004353@dkuug.dk> References: <200309091733.h89HXdaQ004353@dkuug.dk> X-Mailer: VM 7.07 under 21.4 (patch 12) "Portable Code" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk Precedence: bulk Van.Snyder@jpl.nasa.gov writes: > > I've finished a detailed analysis of the application of the edits from > J3 meeting 165 papers to the committee draft. The appended comments > refer to 03-007r1. > > Some of these appear to be blunders, but we should think carefully before > second-guessing J3. All of these except for one appear to be just correcting errors the editor made. (And, as you note, several of them are already separately reported). They are thus pretty clearly appropriate - just making sure that the material already passed is correctly entered. *HOWEVER* You've slipped a major technical issue in between typo corrections. I really wish that wouldn't be buried like that. > [61:2-3] Delete "It ... type" (Edit for [59:15] in 03-224 was > deleted from 03-224r1. Does anybody remember why? This sentence > appears to be important.) This was vigorously debated. I don't recall all the details of the debate, and in the current context, I don't really care. If you choose to redebate it, bring it up as a possible US position. In any case, we have *NO* business in making technical changes like this without full debate and formal vote. I do not think that we should think carefully before second-guessing J3 - I think we should not second guess J3 at all. If we think they made an error (and I offer no opinion on whether or not I think this is one), then bring it up with them. -- Richard Maine | Good judgment comes from experience; Richard.Maine@nasa.gov | experience comes from bad judgment. | -- Mark Twain