From owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk Tue Sep 9 10:42:24 2003 Received: (from majordom@localhost) by dkuug.dk (8.12.8p1/8.9.2) id h898gOP1096386 for sc22wg5-domo; Tue, 9 Sep 2003 10:42:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk) X-Authentication-Warning: ptah.dkuug.dk: majordom set sender to owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk using -f Received: from inf.rl.ac.uk (nfs7.inf.rl.ac.uk [130.246.72.7]) by dkuug.dk (8.12.8p1/8.9.2) with ESMTP id h898gACp096379 for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2003 10:42:16 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk) Received: from numerical.cc.rl.ac.uk (numerical [130.246.8.23]) by inf.rl.ac.uk (8.11.6+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id h898gJo13112 for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2003 09:42:20 +0100 (BST) Received: from rl.ac.uk (jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk [130.246.9.202]) by numerical.cc.rl.ac.uk (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA10862 for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2003 09:51:18 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <3F5D953E.8070909@rl.ac.uk> Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 09:54:22 +0100 From: John Reid Reply-To: j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: WG5 Subject: [Fwd: Re: Processing the ballot] Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------060601070203070406010804" Sender: owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060601070203070406010804 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit WG5, Here is the first draft of a paper that summarizes the votes and responses. Comments are welcome. Cheers, John. --------------060601070203070406010804 Content-Type: text/plain; name="N1575.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="N1575.txt" ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG5 N1575 (Draft of 8 Sept.) Result of the informal ballot John Reid An informal personal ballot on the draft FCD was held during the month of September 2003. The question was as follows: ........................................................................... Ballot on forwarding N1573 (J3/03-007R1) as the FCD for Fortran 2003. Deadline: 9 a.m. UK time on October 1st. [Choose one of the following] Yes Yes, with the following comments No, for the following reasons Signed ............................................................................ All comments were considered by the subgroup consisting of me, Dan Nagle, Richard Maine, and Van Snyder. Here are the ballots with the responses of this subgroup. Appended is a list of all the edits that the subgroup recommended. 1. Richard Maine Yes, with the following comments Apply the following typographical corrections 1. Add "(cont.)" back into the headers of continued notes as in the previous draft. These were unnintentionally dropped. 2. Remove the forced newpage in 1.7 (end of page 5). It is an artifact of pagination problems in an earlier version. 3. [23:6] Delete '("newline", for example)' This edit passed in 220r2, but accidentally not applied. 4. [59:16] "it is is" -> "it is" 5. [64:5] "(D7:Intrinsic assignment statement)" -> "(7.4.1.2)" 6. [113:2] "allocaated" -> "allocated" 7. [430:27] "paraameters" -> "parameters" 8. [447:22] Insert "::" before "real" (but defer to a more complete fix of the technical content of this example if one is proposed.) Subgroup response: accept all these edits. 2. Van Snyder Yes, with the following comments (comments follow angle brackets and subgroup responses have no angle brackets) > [56:12-13] Reformat R451 so as to avoid the 18.8 pt overrun. This > will simultaneously fix the overrun of the same rule on page 513. Agreed. > [208:23] Append "on any file" after "effect". Accept. > [209:22] Append "on any file" after the first "effect". Accept. > In correspondence before meeting 165, Bill Long noticed that there's > no prohibition against deallocating an allocatable , or > changing the pointer association status of a pointer , > inside a SELECT TYPE or ASSOCIATE construct (8.1.4-5). > > I realize it's late -- maybe too late -- to do anything, but if we do > nothing now, we're almost certain to need to process an interpretation > request later. > > There are two possibilities. One is to prohibit these things in > 8.1.4-5. The other is to say something in 16.4.2.1.3 and 16.5.6. > If we do anything, I prefer the former. We suggest that J3 considers this at its next meeting and perhaps submits a suggested change as part of the US ballot. > > [144:9] "data" => "dynamic" Accept. > [144:17] Insert "or a type with the BIND attribute" after "sequence > derived type" (to handle the case allowed by C717). Accept. .............................................................................. List of agreed edits 1. Add "(cont.)" back into the headers of continued notes as in the previous draft. These were unnintentionally dropped. 2. Remove the forced newpage in 1.7 (end of page 5). It is an artifact of pagination problems in an earlier version. 3. [23:6] Delete '("newline", for example)' This edit passed in 220r2, but accidentally not applied. 4. [59:16] "it is is" -> "it is" 5. [64:5] "(D7:Intrinsic assignment statement)" -> "(7.4.1.2)" 6. [113:2] "allocaated" -> "allocated" 7. [430:27] "paraameters" -> "parameters" 8. [447:22] Insert "::" before "real" (but defer to a more complete fix of the technical content of this example if one is proposed.) 9. [56:12-13] Reformat R451 so as to avoid the 18.8 pt overrun. 10. [208:23] Append "on any file" after "effect". 11. [209:22] Append "on any file" after the first "effect". 12. [144:9] "data" => "dynamic" 13. [144:17] Insert "or a type with the BIND attribute" after "sequence derived type" (to handle the case allowed by C717). --------------060601070203070406010804--