From owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk  Fri Aug 15 21:17:03 2003
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
	by dkuug.dk (8.12.8p1/8.9.2) id h7FJH3YU080254
	for sc22wg5-domo; Fri, 15 Aug 2003 21:17:03 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk)
X-Authentication-Warning: ptah.dkuug.dk: majordom set sender to owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk using -f
Received: from mail1.cray.com (mail1.cray.com [136.162.0.111])
	by dkuug.dk (8.12.8p1/8.9.2) with ESMTP id h7FJGvEc080248
	for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Fri, 15 Aug 2003 21:16:58 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from longb@cray.com)
Received: from relayb.mw.cray.com (relayb.us.cray.com [192.168.252.110])
	by mail1.cray.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/gw-1.2) with ESMTP id h7FJGo4G012629;
	Fri, 15 Aug 2003 14:16:50 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from saffron.us.cray.com (saffron.mw.cray.com [172.31.27.14])
	by relayb.mw.cray.com (8.12.9/8.12.6/hub-1.2) with ESMTP id h7FJGnqH015454;
	Fri, 15 Aug 2003 14:16:49 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from cray.com (mh-dhcp-172-31-20-206 [172.31.20.206]) by saffron.us.cray.com (8.8.8/Cray-server-1.6-nhsmod011017) with ESMTP id OAA2711508; Fri, 15 Aug 2003 14:16:49 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <3F3D3371.9060708@cray.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 14:24:33 -0500
From: Bill Long <longb@cray.com>
Reply-To: longb@cray.com
Organization: Cray Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: keith bierman <Keith.Bierman@sun.com>
CC: Robert Corbett <corbett@mpkmail.eng.sun.com>, sc22wg5@dkuug.dk
Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.2944) clarification of technical intent in N1553
References: <0HJM003FYWNQXJ@mpkmail.eng.sun.com> <200308151832.h7FIWhHU080019@dkuug.dk> <200308151850.h7FIoWJi080122@dkuug.dk>
In-Reply-To: <200308151850.h7FIoWJi080122@dkuug.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Cray-VirusStatus: clean
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk
Precedence: bulk



keith bierman wrote:

>
>>  One could argue that things that are not numbers do not have signs.
>
>
> Infinity is not a number. Signed Infinities have significance and 
> great use in the IEEE model. Not all things which are "not numbers" 
> are NaNs ;>


Actually, this is exactly backwards.  Infinity is a perfectly well 
defined number (at least in the mathematics of complex variables), and 
it does not have a sign.  Of course, other parts of the IEEE model are 
horribly wrong mathematically as well.  I guess that's why it is the 
IEEE model and not the AMS model.  Unfortunately a lot of our users do 
know mathematics, and are constantly irritated by the errors in the model.

Cheers,
Bill
 

-- 
Bill Long                                   longb@cray.com
Fortran Technical Support    &              voice: 651-605-9024
Bioinformatics Software Development         fax:   651-605-9142
Cray Inc., 1340 Mendota Heights Rd., Mendota Heights, MN, 55120

            


