From owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk  Sat Aug  9 00:10:12 2003
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
	by dkuug.dk (8.12.8p1/8.9.2) id h78MACt3033915
	for sc22wg5-domo; Sat, 9 Aug 2003 00:10:12 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk)
X-Authentication-Warning: ptah.dkuug.dk: majordom set sender to owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk using -f
Received: from brmea-mail-2.sun.com (brmea-mail-2.Sun.COM [192.18.98.43])
	by dkuug.dk (8.12.8p1/8.9.2) with ESMTP id h78M9gEc033905
	for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Sat, 9 Aug 2003 00:10:08 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from corbett@mpkmail.eng.sun.com)
Received: from engmail2sun.Eng.Sun.COM ([129.144.134.19])
	by brmea-mail-2.sun.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h78M9eh4007440
	for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Fri, 8 Aug 2003 16:09:40 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from phys-mpkmaila (phys-mpkmaila.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.146.18.131])
	by engmail2sun.Eng.Sun.COM (8.12.9+Sun/8.12.9/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id h78M9dUu015558
	for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Fri, 8 Aug 2003 15:09:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lupa (lupa.Eng.Sun.COM [129.146.78.104])
 by mpkmail.eng.sun.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 1 (built Apr  2
 2002)) with SMTP id <0HJB00J1MMW3ES@mpkmail.eng.sun.com> for sc22wg5@dkuug.dk;
 Fri, 08 Aug 2003 15:09:39 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2003 15:09:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: Robert Corbett <corbett@mpkmail.eng.sun.com>
Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.2925) clarification of technical intent in N1553
To: sc22wg5@dkuug.dk
Reply-to: Robert Corbett <corbett@mpkmail.eng.sun.com>
Message-id: <0HJB00J1NMW3ES@mpkmail.eng.sun.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: dtmail 1.3.0 @(#)CDE Version 1.4.8 SunOS 5.8 sun4u sparc
Content-type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-MD5: vYh77occYkWDLZoAJyST+g==
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk
Precedence: bulk

Does it not bother the Fortran committees that they are
approving a different syntax for reading and writing
formatted NaN values from the syntax proposed by the
IEEE floating-point committee?

					Sincerely,
					Bob Corbett

