From owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk  Wed Jul 23 19:49:26 2003
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
	by dkuug.dk (8.12.8p1/8.9.2) id h6NHnQ0K014158
	for sc22wg5-domo; Wed, 23 Jul 2003 19:49:26 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk)
X-Authentication-Warning: ptah.dkuug.dk: majordom set sender to owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk using -f
Received: from inf.rl.ac.uk (nfs7.inf.rl.ac.uk [130.246.72.7])
	by dkuug.dk (8.12.8p1/8.9.2) with ESMTP id h6NHnLEc014153
	for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Wed, 23 Jul 2003 19:49:22 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk)
Received: from numerical.cc.rl.ac.uk (numerical [130.246.8.23])
	by inf.rl.ac.uk (8.11.6+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id h6NHl4D29656
	for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Wed, 23 Jul 2003 18:47:04 +0100 (BST)
Received: from rl.ac.uk (jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk [130.246.9.202])
	by numerical.cc.rl.ac.uk (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA04027
	for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Wed, 23 Jul 2003 18:58:16 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <3F1ECC69.7090206@rl.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 18:56:57 +0100
From: John Reid <j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk>
Reply-To: j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk
Organization: Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: WG5 <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>
Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.2891) New papers
References: <200307231652.h6NGq3i1013869@dkuug.dk> <200307231723.h6NHNAdV014031@dkuug.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk
Precedence: bulk



Richard Maine wrote:
> John Reid writes:
> 
>  > Glossary. Why have all the italics been removed? I suggest:
>  > 
>  > 427:6. Add 'Where the definition uses a term that is itself defined 
>  > in this glossary, the first occurrence of the term in that definition 
>  > is printed in italics.' [F95 words]  
>  > 
>  > Glossary: restore the italics. [Makes it clearer.]
> 
> I strongly object to this for multiple reasons.  Note that the italics
> were removed by explicit J3 vote quite some time back.

[Stuff omitted.]

OK I will remove this suggestion from N1546. I noticed this only 
recently and it came to me as a surprise. The italics were very 
important when the glossary was first constructed (8x days), when terms 
were not being used consistently.

Cheers,

John.


