From owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk  Thu Jul 10 19:53:44 2003
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
	by dkuug.dk (8.12.8p1/8.9.2) id h6AHri24061591
	for sc22wg5-domo; Thu, 10 Jul 2003 19:53:44 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk)
X-Authentication-Warning: ptah.dkuug.dk: majordom set sender to owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk using -f
Received: from nwkea-mail-2.sun.com (nwkea-mail-2.sun.com [192.18.42.14])
	by dkuug.dk (8.12.8p1/8.9.2) with ESMTP id h6AHrWEc061585
	for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Thu, 10 Jul 2003 19:53:40 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from michaeli@ranma.eng.sun.com)
Received: from engmail2sun.Eng.Sun.COM ([129.144.134.19])
	by nwkea-mail-2.sun.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6AHrQBq020972;
	Thu, 10 Jul 2003 10:53:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ranma.eng.sun.com (ranma.Eng.Sun.COM [129.146.78.89])
	by engmail2sun.Eng.Sun.COM (8.12.9+Sun/8.12.9/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id h6AHrQUu025585;
	Thu, 10 Jul 2003 10:53:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from michaeli@localhost)
	by ranma.eng.sun.com (8.11.7+Sun/8.11.7) id h6AHrPF05610;
	Thu, 10 Jul 2003 10:53:25 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 10:53:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: Michael Ingrassia <michaeli@ranma.eng.sun.com>
Message-Id: <200307101753.h6AHrPF05610@ranma.eng.sun.com>
To: sc22wg5@dkuug.dk, j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk
Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.2863) Straw votes to ponder concerning Modules TR
X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk
Precedence: bulk

>And I think everything needs to be the same, not just the 
>characteristics.

Let me see if I understand the issue.

INTERFACE
	SUBROUTINE S(I,J)
	END SUBROUTINE S
END INTERFACE

and

INTERFACE
	SUBROUTINE S(J, I)
	END SUBROUTINE S
END INTERFACE

are two interface blocks for the same procedure that differ only in
non-characteristics (the spelling of the dummy argument names).
A call

	CALL S(I=7, J=8)

is consistent with both interface blocks but might well deliver different
results depending on which of the pair it conforms to.

Is that (part of) your point?

	--Michael I.