From owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk  Thu Jun 26 00:21:39 2003
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
	by dkuug.dk (8.12.8p1/8.9.2) id h5PMLdCt062386
	for sc22wg5-domo; Thu, 26 Jun 2003 00:21:39 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk)
X-Authentication-Warning: ptah.dkuug.dk: majordom set sender to owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk using -f
Received: from mailhub.dfrc.nasa.gov (mailhub.dfrc.nasa.gov [130.134.81.12])
	by dkuug.dk (8.12.8p1/8.9.2) with ESMTP id h5PMKBEc062366
	for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Thu, 26 Jun 2003 00:21:35 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from maine@altair.dfrc.nasa.gov)
Received: from mail.dfrc.nasa.gov by mailhub.dfrc.nasa.gov with ESMTP for sc22wg5@dkuug.dk; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 15:17:28 -0700
Received: from altair.dfrc.nasa.gov ([130.134.20.211])
          by mail.dfrc.nasa.gov (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223
          ID# 0-71686U2500L200S0V35) with ESMTP id gov
          for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 15:20:04 -0700
Received: by altair.dfrc.nasa.gov (Postfix, from userid 201)
	id C050C3508B; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 15:19:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: Richard Maine <Richard.Maine@nasa.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <16122.8205.694354.220396@altair.dfrc.nasa.gov>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 15:19:57 -0700
To: sc22wg5@dkuug.dk
Subject: Re: Submodule association and host association
X-Mailer: VM 7.07 under 21.4 (patch 12) "Portable Code" XEmacs Lucid
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk
Precedence: bulk

I apparently got confused enough by the quoting style (or by something
- the quoting style sounds like a good "excuse") to misunderstand what
the current subject was.

When I was talking about a gratuitous restriction, I was talking
about disallowing a procedure implementation (or separate body, or
whatever we call it) from being in the same module as the separate
interface (or whetever we call that).

I quite agree that modules that can be imbedded within other
modules would be a new feature (and one that I'd have serious
reservations about also).  If we wanted to allow it, we'd have to
actively add new syntax and answer several new questions about how
it worked.  I don't favor that at the moment, and it certainly isn't
anything that has been in previous drafts of the TR.  I would think it
something that would add significant complication to the TR.

-- 
Richard Maine                |  Good judgment comes from experience;
Richard.Maine@nasa.gov       |  experience comes from bad judgment.
                             |        -- Mark Twain
