From owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk Wed Jun 18 18:15:12 2003 Received: (from majordom@localhost) by dkuug.dk (8.12.8p1/8.9.2) id h5IGFCgV015304 for sc22wg5-domo; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 18:15:12 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk) X-Authentication-Warning: ptah.dkuug.dk: majordom set sender to owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk using -f Received: from mail1.cray.com (mail1.cray.com [136.162.0.111]) by dkuug.dk (8.12.8p1/8.9.2) with ESMTP id h5IGF2Ec015294 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 18:15:07 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from longb@cray.com) Received: from relayb.mw.cray.com (relayb.us.cray.com [192.168.252.110]) by mail1.cray.com (8.12.9/8.12.3/gw-1.14) with ESMTP id h5IGEslW029734; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 11:14:54 -0500 (CDT) Received: from saffron.us.cray.com (saffron.mw.cray.com [172.31.27.14]) by relayb.mw.cray.com (8.12.9/8.12.6/hub-1.2) with ESMTP id h5IGEnPA016686; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 11:14:49 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cray.com (mh-dhcp-172-31-20-91 [172.31.20.91]) by saffron.us.cray.com (8.8.8/Cray-server-1.6-nhsmod011017) with ESMTP id LAA4467568; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 11:14:49 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <3EF09193.8060408@cray.com> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 11:21:39 -0500 From: Bill Long Reply-To: longb@cray.com Organization: Cray Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Aleksandar Donev CC: sc22wg5@dkuug.dk, "J.L.Schonfelder" , Van Snyder Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.2776) Modules TR References: <200306180116.h5I1GmdL011630@dkuug.dk> <200306180937.h5I9beL8013363@dkuug.dk> <200306181511.h5IFBGIm014975@dkuug.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Cray-VirusStatus: clean Sender: owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk Precedence: bulk Aleksandar Donev wrote: > I personally would prefer: > > SUBMODULE(Parent_Module) :: Sub_Module > ... > IMPLEMENTS > ! Separate procedures > CONTAINS > ! Regular ones > END SUBMODULE > In the last round of J3 debates on choice of keywords (forward, separate, implementation, etc.) none of the choices was a clear winner. Most of the votes seemed to be against something the voter really disliked. I think the proposal from Aleks above is significantly better. It's clear and uncluttered, and avoids the problem of modifying the subroutine/function statement (at least in the submodule). Something to actually vote FOR.! Cheers, Bill -- Bill Long longb@cray.com Fortran Technical Support & voice: 651-605-9024 Bioinformatics Software Development fax: 651-605-9142 Cray Inc., 1340 Mendota Heights Rd., Mendota Heights, MN, 55120