From owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk  Wed Jun 11 18:49:02 2003
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
	by dkuug.dk (8.12.8p1/8.9.2) id h5BGn2NE070826
	for sc22wg5-domo; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 18:49:02 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk)
X-Authentication-Warning: ptah.dkuug.dk: majordom set sender to owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk using -f
Received: from inf.rl.ac.uk (nfs7.inf.rl.ac.uk [130.246.72.7])
	by dkuug.dk (8.12.8p1/8.9.2) with ESMTP id h5BGmvEc070820
	for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 18:48:58 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk)
Received: from numerical.cc.rl.ac.uk (numerical [130.246.8.23])
	by inf.rl.ac.uk (8.11.6+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id h5BGl9D09446
	for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 17:47:09 +0100 (BST)
Received: from rl.ac.uk (jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk [130.246.9.202])
	by numerical.cc.rl.ac.uk (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA25950
	for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 17:57:41 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <3EE75E53.1080609@rl.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 17:52:35 +0100
From: John Reid <j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk>
Reply-To: j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk
Organization: Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: WG5 <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>
Subject: Name of the language
References: <200306111639.h5BGdYnY070740@dkuug.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk
Precedence: bulk


Dear WG5,

Thanks to everyone who has responded to my email on the name. It is a
typical 'bicycle shed' issue of course and it has been my aim a
convener to avoid spending a lot of plenary WG5 time on it. However,
we will need to decide in Dresden whether to stay with 'Fortran 2000'.
My reading of the email is that  'Fortran 2003' is the only serious
contender and that most people can  see merit  both in staying with
'Fortran 2000' and changing to 'Fortran 2003'. I propose to
take a simple straw vote at Dresden, including votes from those not
there, and to restrict discussion.

Based on your email, here is what I think your votes are:

Craig   2003
Dan     2000
David   2003
John    2003
Kurt    2003
Lawrie  2003
Makki   2000
Mallory 2003
Michael 2003
Mike M  2000
Miles   2000
Richard 2000
Van     2003
Walt    2003

Please will you tell me (PRIVATELY, please) if I have it wrong for you
or if you would like your name and vote added.

As you see, we err towards changing at the moment (9-5).

Cheers,

John.