From owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk Fri May 9 11:16:12 2003 Received: (from majordom@localhost) by dkuug.dk (8.12.8p1/8.9.2) id h499GCWj035094 for sc22wg5-domo; Fri, 9 May 2003 11:16:12 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk) X-Authentication-Warning: ptah.dkuug.dk: majordom set sender to owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk using -f Received: from inf.rl.ac.uk (nfs7.inf.rl.ac.uk [130.246.72.7]) by dkuug.dk (8.12.8p1/8.9.2) with ESMTP id h499G7Ec035089 for ; Fri, 9 May 2003 11:16:09 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk) Received: from numerical.cc.rl.ac.uk (numerical [130.246.8.23]) by inf.rl.ac.uk (8.11.6+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id h499Faq03683 for ; Fri, 9 May 2003 10:15:36 +0100 (BST) Received: from rl.ac.uk (jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk [130.246.9.202]) by numerical.cc.rl.ac.uk (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA21211 for ; Fri, 9 May 2003 10:25:29 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <3EBB7287.5070307@rl.ac.uk> Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 10:19:03 +0100 From: John Reid Reply-To: j.k.reid@rl.ac.uk Organization: Rutherford Appleton Laboratory User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: sc22wg5@dkuug.dk Subject: N1528 and N1532 References: <200305081932.h48JWppD030483@dkuug.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk Precedence: bulk Richard Maine wrote: > Sorry for deluging wg5 with so many papers right in a row and without > pre-arranging numbers for them, which I probably should have done. > One confusion seems to have resulted from my failure to adequately > co-ordinate this. > > N1528 is just an earlier draft of N1529. They differ only in that > N1529 added 2 edits at the end (and N1528 seems to have gotten a less > informative title). > > I'd suggest just ignoring N1528, or perhaps John can delete that paper > and reuse the number for something else. I have replaced the text of N1528 by the words 'Paper withdrawn', and modified the index to correspond. Richard Maine wrote: > The N1532.txt on the server seems to have accidentally lost the > last edit. It has the explanation of what the edit is for, but > the edit itself dropped off the end, most likely in the process > cutting and pasting from my email. Here's a corrected copy as > an attachment. Sorry about that - it is not easy with my new mailer to copy files out of a mail message without losing the line formatting. I have replaced N1532 by the new version. Please, everyone, send me attachments. Strictly speaking, I should not have modified either of these papers. If anyone has downloaded them, please discard your download versions. Cheers, John.