From owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk  Sat May  3 00:39:57 2003
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
	by dkuug.dk (8.12.8p1/8.9.2) id h42MdvCH086016
	for sc22wg5-domo; Sat, 3 May 2003 00:39:57 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk)
X-Authentication-Warning: ptah.dkuug.dk: majordom set sender to owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk using -f
Received: from mailhub.dfrc.nasa.gov (mailhub.dfrc.nasa.gov [130.134.81.12])
	by dkuug.dk (8.12.8p1/8.9.2) with ESMTP id h42MdqEc086010
	for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Sat, 3 May 2003 00:39:53 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from maine@altair.dfrc.nasa.gov)
Received: from mail.dfrc.nasa.gov by mailhub.dfrc.nasa.gov with ESMTP for sc22wg5@dkuug.dk; Fri, 2 May 2003 15:38:29 -0700
Received: from altair.dfrc.nasa.gov ([130.134.20.211])
          by mail.dfrc.nasa.gov (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223
          ID# 0-71686U2500L200S0V35) with ESMTP id gov
          for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Fri, 2 May 2003 15:40:40 -0700
Received: from altair.dfrc.nasa.gov (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by altair.dfrc.nasa.gov (8.12.8/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h42MehEc009259
	for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Fri, 2 May 2003 15:40:43 -0700
Received: (from maine@localhost)
	by altair.dfrc.nasa.gov (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h42MehRb009255;
	Fri, 2 May 2003 15:40:43 -0700
From: Richard Maine <Richard.Maine@nasa.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <16050.62443.446503.305015@altair.dfrc.nasa.gov>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 15:40:43 -0700
To: sc22wg5@dkuug.dk
Subject: Typos and editorial trivia in 03-007
X-Mailer: VM 7.07 under 21.4 (patch 8) "Honest Recruiter" XEmacs Lucid
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk
Precedence: bulk


Here's an initial draft of a paper for Dresden.  I expect to add
more to this paper, so it probably shouldn't get a number yet.
But thought I might circulate the draft just so that I don't get
20 different people pointing out the same problems.

-- 
Richard Maine                |  Good judgment comes from experience;
Richard.Maine@nasa.gov       |  experience comes from bad judgment.
                             |        -- Mark Twain
-------------------------------------------------
Date:     2 May 03
To:       WG5
From:     Richard Maine
Subject:  Typos and editorial trivia in 03-007

This paper has edits to correct some typos and editorial trivia
in 03-007.  All page and line references are to 03-007.

Aleksander Donev pointed out the following typos

  [59:Note 4.51]  Reformat the example as

     TYPE, ABSTRACT :: FILE_HANDLE
     CONTAINS
        PROCEDURE(OPEN_FILE), DEFERRED, PASS(HANDLE) :: OPEN
        ...
     END TYPE

  [445:36] Indent this line like the REAL declarations earlier.

Dick Hendrickson pointed out the following

  [44:19] "accessibile" -> "accessible"

  [47:Note 4.24 2nd line] "to to" -> "to"

  [47:16] "sitype-param-decl" -> "<type-param-decl>"

  [55:10] "<interace>" -> "<interface>"

  [164:23] "paraqmeter" -> "parameter"

  [299:29] "allocatiom" -> "allocation"

  [340:Note 13.15 2nd line] "transfering" -> "transferring"

  [449:12] The wrong style of dash was typeset, but instead of
  just changing the dash, a better edit is "-so" -> ";".

  Section 10 has 3 cases of "nondelimited" and 1 of "undelimited".
  I agree with Dick that "undelimited" sounds better, so I propose
  changing "[a] nondelimited" to "[an] undelimited" at [240:21],
  [241:6], [243:3], and [248:4].  Alternatively, we could change
  "undelimited" to "nondelimited" at [246:Note 10.35 3rd line].
  Don't do both edits.  (If this paper passes without directions
  otherwise, do the 4 changes instead of the alternative one.)

James Giles pointed out the following

  [308:8] "=\pi" -> "-\pi"  (where \pi means the math symbol).

And on my own initiative...

The word "since" is best reserved for contexts where it refers to
time.  Some of the uses in the draft are appropriate, but others
are not.  In some cases, it is potentially confusing because time
is involved in the sentence, but that isn't what the "since" is
referring to.

  "since" -> "because" (retaining capitalization) at

    [8:34], [12:Note 2.2], [45:Note 4.21 line 6] [49:Note 4.27],
    [277:Note 12.31], [347:21], [368:20],
    [414:Note 16.10 line 19], [440:38], [465:25]

  "since" -> "in that" at [441:7]
  (Both "since" and "because" seem wrong here).
