From owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk Wed Feb 12 19:27:51 2003 Received: (from majordom@localhost) by dkuug.dk (8.9.2/8.9.2) id TAA69384 for sc22wg5-domo; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 19:27:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk) X-Authentication-Warning: ptah.dkuug.dk: majordom set sender to owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk using -f Received: from nameserv.rl.ac.uk (nameserv.rl.ac.uk [130.246.135.129]) by dkuug.dk (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id TAA69378 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 19:27:46 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jkr@jkr.cc.rl.ac.uk) Received: from jkr.cc.rl.ac.uk (jkr.cc.rl.ac.uk [130.246.8.20]) by nameserv.rl.ac.uk (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA10123 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 18:27:53 GMT Received: (from jkr@localhost) by jkr.cc.rl.ac.uk (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) id SAA11384 for SC22WG5@dkuug.dk; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 18:32:25 GMT Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 18:32:25 GMT From: John Reid Message-Id: <200302121832.SAA11384@jkr.cc.rl.ac.uk> To: SC22WG5@dkuug.dk Subject: Processing the ballot MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-sc22wg5@dkuug.dk Precedence: bulk WG5, I have begun to think about how WG5 should decide on its response to the ballot comments. I propose that very early in the meeting we agree on a list of suggestions that we need to consider explicitly and a list of suggestions that are editorial or so minor that they should be delegated to J3 to take whatever action it considers appropriate. A draft for these lists will be in paper N1510. We also need to construct a response document. It will not be possible to complete this until we have decided on all the technical issues, but I think it will be very helpful to have a first draft available at the beginning of the meeting. This will be N1511. It will include explanations for those items not in either list in N1510. I have constructed drafts of both N1510 and N1511, which I will send separately. I have not put either on the server yet because I would like comments, please. I need comments on the overall approach and on whether items are missing or incorrectly categorized. Please do not comment on whether you like a particular item - what I want to know is if you agree that it should be delegated to J3, discussed explicitly, or rejected with an explanation in N1511. Best wishes, John.