From owner-sc22wg5  Wed Oct 16 17:46:47 2002
Received: from fecit.fr ([195.25.240.221])
	by dkuug.dk (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id RAA05651
	for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 17:46:47 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from waveren@fujitsu.fr)
Received: from fujitsu.fr (dhcp0.fecit.fr [192.168.1.249])
	by fecit.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA29173
	for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 17:44:38 +0200
Sender: waveren@fecit.fr
Message-ID: <3DAD894D.48C46F43@fujitsu.fr>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 17:44:13 +0200
From: Matthijs van Waveren <waveren@fujitsu.fr>
Organization: Fujitsu Systems Europe Ltd
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.18-3 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: sc22wg5@dkuug.dk
Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.2607) The name of the language
References: <200210151636.SAA92868@dkuug.dk>
		<200210161049.MAA03349@dkuug.dk> <200210161451.QAA05290@dkuug.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Richard Maine wrote:

> While answering a question on comp.lang.fortran yesterday, I was
> reminded that people within the committee aren't the only ones
> who have already made a lot of references to the f2k name.  For
> example, there is Lawson Wakefield's f2kcli package.

WG5 had a straw vote on the name at the Oulu meeting, and Fortran 2000
won the day. To my impression, it is better to stick to Fortran 2000.

Matthijs van Waveren