From JLS@liverpool.ac.uk Wed Sep 16 14:42:20 1992 Received: from vm.uni-c.dk by dkuug.dk via EUnet with SMTP (5.64+/8+bit/IDA-1.2.8) id AA16510; Wed, 16 Sep 92 14:42:20 +0200 Received: from vm.uni-c.dk by vm.uni-c.dk (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 9119; Wed, 16 Sep 92 14:42:44 DNT Received: from UKACRL.BITNET by vm.uni-c.dk (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 1546; Wed, 16 Sep 92 14:42:44 DNT Received: from RL.IB by UKACRL.BITNET (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 7239; Wed, 16 Sep 92 13:42:35 BST Received: from RL.IB by UK.AC.RL.IB (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 8476; Wed, 16 Sep 92 13:42:34 BST Via: UK.AC.LIV.LIVBIRD; 16 SEP 92 13:42:32 BST Received: from ibm.liverpool.ac.uk by liverbird.liverpool.ac.uk via JANET with NIFTP (PP) id <27098-0@liverbird.liverpool.ac.uk>; Wed, 16 Sep 1992 13:33:50 +0100 Received: from UK.AC.LIVERPOOL by MAILER(4.4.t); 16 Sep 1992 13:41:49 BST Date: Wed, 16 Sep 92 13:40:44 BST From: Lawrie Schonfelder Subject: SC22 report To: SC22/WG5 members Message-Id: <"liverbird..100:16.08.92.12.33.56"@liverbird.liverpool.ac.uk> X-Charset: ASCII X-Char-Esc: 29 I share David's concern. The rreport was seriously misleading. Lawrie