From Wclodius@aol.com  Tue May 15 06:00:50 2001
Received: from imo-m06.mx.aol.com (imo-m06.mx.aol.com [64.12.136.161])
	by dkuug.dk (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id GAA43874
	for <SC22WG5@dkuug.dk>; Tue, 15 May 2001 06:00:49 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from Wclodius@aol.com)
From: Wclodius@aol.com
Received: from Wclodius@aol.com
	by imo-m06.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v30.10.) id m.23.bb0b8e5 (3318);
	Tue, 15 May 2001 00:00:15 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <23.bb0b8e5.283203ce@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 00:00:14 EDT
Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.2061) Interp F90/204
To: jkr@rl.ac.uk, SC22WG5@dkuug.dk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Mac - Post-GM sub 146

Am I correct that in the current and draft standards users cannot write 
procedures whose arguments have the semantics of intrinsic assignment, and 
hence cannot write a MVBITS of their own? If I am correct, has there been any 
request for this capability?