From jkr@jkr.cc.rl.ac.uk Mon Mar 26 18:50:40 2001 Received: from nameserv.rl.ac.uk (nameserv.rl.ac.uk [130.246.135.129]) by dkuug.dk (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id SAA92752 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 18:50:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jkr@jkr.cc.rl.ac.uk) Received: from jkr.cc.rl.ac.uk (jkr.cc.rl.ac.uk [130.246.8.20]) by nameserv.rl.ac.uk (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA03643 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 17:50:36 +0100 Received: (from jkr@localhost) by jkr.cc.rl.ac.uk (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) id RAA17787 for SC22WG5@dkuug.dk; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 17:52:33 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 17:52:33 +0100 (BST) From: John Reid Message-Id: <200103261652.RAA17787@jkr.cc.rl.ac.uk> To: SC22WG5@dkuug.dk Subject: Provisional result of the ballot on interpretations MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" WG5, Here is my draft of a WG5 paper on the result of the ballot. Please let me know if I have made mislaid your vote or made an error. Best wishes, John. ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG5-N1428 Results of the ballot on interpretations John Reid, 26 March 2001 90/ JP 14 15 32 73 75 197 12 Cohen y y y y yc y y Gorelik y y y y y y y North y y y y y y y Schoenauer y y y y y y y Snyder y y y y yc y y Takata y y y y n y y Whitlock y y y y y y y Comments and reasons for no vote 75 Cohen Please fix the typo in the QUESTION section: viz > !Alternative: CALL t_asgn_t(a,b) should be > !Alternative: CALL t_asgn_t(t_plus_t,a) 75 Snyder With the change noticed by Maki 75 Takata The example in the QUESTION includes: > PURE FUNCTION t_plus_t(a,b) > TYPE(t) t_plus_t,a,b > INTENT(IN) a,b > t_plus_t = a !defined assignment > !Alternative: CALL t_asgn_t(a,b) > t_plus_t%value = t_plus_t%value + b%value > END FUNCTION The commented-out CALL statement should read: !Alternative: CALL t_asgn_t(t_plus_t,a) This should be mentioned in the ANSWER, or, preferably, the QUESTION itself be amended accordingly. ........................................................... All items except 75 passed unanimously. 75 clearly needs the change suggested in the comments. I declare that 75 has passed following the application of this amendment.