From whitlock@bugsy.zko.dec.com  Sat Mar 17 15:08:49 2001
Received: from zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (zmamail05.zma.compaq.com [161.114.64.105])
	by dkuug.dk (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id PAA29900
	for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Sat, 17 Mar 2001 15:08:49 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from whitlock@bugsy.zko.dec.com)
Received: by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix, from userid 12345)
	id F065C72E5; Sat, 17 Mar 2001 09:08:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net [16.47.4.103])
	by zmamail05.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E57107026
	for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Sat, 17 Mar 2001 09:08:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix, from userid 12345)
	id 70C85168; Sat, 17 Mar 2001 09:08:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from bugsy (bugsy.zko.dec.com [16.31.64.14])
	by taynzmail03.nz-tay.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 55D041A6
	for <SC22WG5@dkuug.dk>; Sat, 17 Mar 2001 09:08:17 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 09:05:21 -0500
Message-Id: <01031709052127@bugsy.zko.dec.com>
From: whitlock@bugsy.zko.dec.com (Stan Whitlock (603)884-2011 ZKO2-3/N30)
To: SC22WG5@dkuug.dk
Subject: Re: N1423: WG5 letter ballot on interpretations
X-VMS-To: SC22WG5@DKUUG.DK,CC

Here are my votes on the WG5 N1423 letter ballot on 7 F95 interps.

/Stan Whitlock
 Compaq Computer Corp.

********************************************************************************

                                          ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG5 N1423

          WG5 letter ballot on Fortran 95 interpretations
                      John Reid, 17 January 2001

I have made minor corections to items 14, 15, 32, 73, as requested with
YES ballots by J3 members.  

The following Fortran 95 interpretations are being balloted: 

Yes   No    Number       Title

-X-   ---   000014       Format of complex numbers in list-directed
                           and namelist output 

-X-   ---   000015       Commas in list-directed output


-X-   ---   000032       Is the TRANSFER function result undefined?

-X-   ---   000073       Is padding allowed in storage sequences?

-X-   ---   000075       Defined assignment and INTENT(IN) dummy
                           arguments in PURE procedures

-X-   ---   F90/000197   Relationship of NEAREST and SPACING

-X-   ---   JP-12        Bounds of each dimension of an array pointer

Please mark the above "yes" or "no" answer {be sure to include your
reasons with "no"} and send only the above text {not this entire mail
mail message} to 

        sc22wg5@dkuug.dk

by midnight Friday, 23 March 2001, in order to be counted.