From dtm@holyrood.ed.ac.uk  Mon Jan 22 13:04:10 2001
Received: from holyrood.ed.ac.uk (holyrood.ed.ac.uk [129.215.16.14])
	by dkuug.dk (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id NAA04930
	for <sc22wg5@dkuug.dk>; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 13:04:09 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from dtm@holyrood.ed.ac.uk)
Received: (from dtm@localhost)
	by holyrood.ed.ac.uk (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA20088
	for sc22wg5@dkuug.dk; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 12:04:03 GMT
Message-Id: <200101221204.MAA20088@holyrood.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 22 Jan 2001  12:04:03 GMT
From: D Muxworthy <dtm@holyrood.ed.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.1987) N1423: WG5 letter ballot on interpretations
To: sc22wg5@dkuug.dk

Yes   No    Number       Title

-x-   ---   000014       Format of complex numbers in list-directed
                           and namelist output 

-x-   ---   000015       Commas in list-directed output

-x-   ---   000032       Is the TRANSFER function result undefined?

-x-   ---   000073       Is padding allowed in storage sequences?

-x-   ---   000075       Defined assignment and INTENT(IN) dummy
                           arguments in PURE procedures

"Yes" to 00075 on the assumption that Makki's point is addressed.

-x-   ---   F90/000197   Relationship of NEAREST and SPACING

-x-   ---   JP-12        Bounds of each dimension of an array pointer


Comment on F90/000197:
The answer to interp F90/000197 is correct but not helpful.  Section
13.14.76 of F95 (13.13.75 in F90) is the only place in the document
which refers to "machine representable numbers", while the summary
section 13.11.12 uses the term "processor number" which is again the
only usage.  The remainder of the floating point manipulation functions
deal with model numbers, as noted at 13.7. 

NEAREST is thus different from the other functions but it is easy to
overlook this.  The example used in the description still refers to the
basic model however and would appear to indicate that NEAREST(X,1.) will
normally have the same value as X + SPACING(X). 

I am not suggesting a change to the interpretation answer but it would
be helpful to have a note in F200x highlighting this difference, and
giving an example of when NEAREST(X,1.) is different from X +
SPACING(X).  Is this likely to be true only at extreme values?

David Muxworthy
