From jkr@jkr.cc.rl.ac.uk  Wed Sep 20 15:16:17 2000
Received: from nameserv.rl.ac.uk (nameserv.rl.ac.uk [130.246.135.129])
	by dkuug.dk (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id PAA24306
	for <SC22WG5@dkuug.dk>; Wed, 20 Sep 2000 15:16:17 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from jkr@jkr.cc.rl.ac.uk)
Received: from jkr.cc.rl.ac.uk (jkr.cc.rl.ac.uk [130.246.8.20])
	by nameserv.rl.ac.uk (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA18792;
	Wed, 20 Sep 2000 14:16:13 +0100
Received: (from jkr@localhost)
	by jkr.cc.rl.ac.uk (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) id OAA10735;
	Wed, 20 Sep 2000 14:17:20 +0100 (BST)
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 14:17:20 +0100 (BST)
From: John Reid <jkr@rl.ac.uk>
Message-Id: <200009201317.OAA10735@jkr.cc.rl.ac.uk>
To: E.W.Kruyt@lumc.nl
Subject: RE: (SC22WG5.1923) WG5 letter ballot on Corrigendum 1 (N1419)
Cc: SC22WG5@dkuug.dk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

> 
> John,
> 
> What is the reason for the asymmetry between [54:34] and [56:32] which now
> will be created?
> 
> For the automatic array "non constant specification expression" will be
> changed in "not initialization expression" and for the assumed size array
> not. Both sizes have to be computed at subprogram entrance!
> 
> Erik  

Yes, I agree with you. I think the third edit for page 54 [54:34]
should be discarded. 

Cheers,

John.