From dnagle@erols.com Tue Jul 11 20:04:20 2000 Received: from smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.61]) by dkuug.dk (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id UAA52276 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 20:04:19 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dnagle@erols.com) Received: from 216-164-137-29.s283.tnt4.lnhva.md.dialup.rcn.com ([216.164.137.29] helo=erols.com) by smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #3) id 13C4OE-0003J1-00 for SC22WG5@dkuug.dk; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 14:04:14 -0400 Message-ID: <396B6191.36502C04@erols.com> Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 14:04:01 -0400 From: Dan Nagle Organization: Purple Sage Computing Solutions, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: SC22WG5@dkuug.dk Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.1880) WG5 letter ballot on Fortran 95 interpretations, part 2 References: <200007041713.TAA26212@dkuug.dk> <200007111542.RAA51894@dkuug.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit John Reid wrote: > > Dear WG5 members, > > The following Fortran 95 interpretations are being balloted: > > Yes No Number Title > > -x- --- F90/000100 ASSOCIATED intrinsic and zero-sized objects > > -x- --- F90/000179 DO variable with POINTER attribute > > -x- --- F90/000185 What is the allocation status of an array > after an allocation failure? > > -x- --- F90/000194 Statements between SELECT CASE and CASE > -- Cheers! Dan Nagle Purple Sage Computing Solutions, Inc.